Emily Smith‐Greenaway
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ashton M. VerderyRachel MargolisJonathan DawJenny TrinitapoliShelley ClarkSara YeatmanRachel KidmanAlissa Koski
- Topics
- Global Maternal and Child Health (20 papers)Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (19 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Emily Smith‐Greenaway
39 papers receiving 758 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Clinical Psychology 282
- General Health Professions 277
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 228
- Sociology and Political Science 194
- Health 172
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Smith‐Greenaway
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Smith‐Greenaway's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Smith‐Greenaway with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Smith‐Greenaway more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Smith‐Greenaway
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Smith‐Greenaway. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Smith‐Greenaway. The network helps show where Emily Smith‐Greenaway may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Smith‐Greenaway
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Smith‐Greenaway. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Smith‐Greenaway based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Smith‐Greenaway. Emily Smith‐Greenaway is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 229 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Emily Smith‐Greenaway
Emily Smith‐Greenaway is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 798 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (20 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (19 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (172 citations), Gender Studies (155 citations) and Clinical Psychology (282 citations). Emily Smith‐Greenaway has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ashton M. Verdery, Rachel Margolis, Jonathan Daw, Jenny Trinitapoli, Shelley Clark, Sara Yeatman, Rachel Kidman, Alissa Koski, William G. Axinn and Christie Sennott. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and American Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.