Pramod Ingle

25 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers

Pramod Ingle
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Biomaterials 54
  • Materials Chemistry 152
  • Plant Science 94
  • Rehabilitation 14
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 15
Replace Ashok Kumar Mandal with:
Ashok Kumar Mandal Nepal
Fahe Wang China
Kamyar Jounaki Iran
Ved Prakash Giri India
S. Bharathi India
Yulia Yugay Russia
Siva Vijayakumar Tharumasivam India
Venkadapathi Jeyanthi India
Emir Akdaşçi Türkiye
Robert Gruszecki Poland
Pramod Ingle relative to Ashok Kumar Mandal Nepal Ashok Kumar Mandal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Ashok Kumar Mandal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pramod Ingle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pramod Ingle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pramod Ingle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pramod Ingle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pramod Ingle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pramod Ingle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pramod Ingle. The network helps show where Pramod Ingle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pramod Ingle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pramod Ingle Line = papers co-authored together Pramod Ingle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202264
2 201853
3 202346
4 202137
5 202123
6 202218
7 201818
8 202314
9 202111
10 202310
11 20219
12 20228
13 20207
14 20235
15 20244
16 20244
17 20204
18 20232
19 20221
20 20251

About Pramod Ingle

Pramod Ingle is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Food Science, Plant Science, Biomedical Engineering and Infectious Diseases, having authored 26 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications (12 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (5 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (3 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers), Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection (2 papers), Moringa oleifera research and applications (2 papers) and Fungal Biology and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (54 citations), Materials Chemistry (152 citations), Plant Science (94 citations), Rehabilitation (14 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (15 citations). Pramod Ingle has collaborated with scholars based in India, Poland and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Mahendra Rai, Aniket Gade, Avinash P. Ingle, Sudhir Shende, Priti Paralikar, Tatiana Minkina, Beata Zimowska, Rajesh W. Raut, Vishnu D. Rajput and Saglara Mandzhieva. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience, IET Nanobiotechnology, Chemosphere and Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact