Piper Treuting

893 total citations
8 papers, 635 citations indexed

About

Piper Treuting is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Immunology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Piper Treuting has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 635 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Immunology and 2 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Piper Treuting's work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). Piper Treuting is often cited by papers focused on Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers) and Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers). Piper Treuting collaborates with scholars based in United States and Russia. Piper Treuting's co-authors include Alexander Y. Rudensky, Jason D. Fontenot, Nikole Perdue, Daniel Campbell, Blythe Sather, John Morton, Peter S. Rabinovitch, Warren Ladiges, Norman S. Wolf and Mary J. Emond and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and The Journal of Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Piper Treuting

8 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Piper Treuting United States	6	414	165	72	71	56	8	635
Carl A. Mitchell United States	8	178 0.4×	282 1.7×	32 0.4×	61 0.9×	50 0.9×	9	521
Laura Arthur United States	7	288 0.7×	258 1.6×	64 0.9×	30 0.4×	60 1.1×	7	566
Victoria E. Kennedy United States	11	87 0.2×	143 0.9×	25 0.3×	35 0.5×	34 0.6×	21	315
Noriyuki Otsuka Japan	11	193 0.5×	158 1.0×	82 1.1×	64 0.9×	43 0.8×	35	504
Michael DiIorio United States	7	254 0.6×	113 0.7×	145 2.0×	30 0.4×	18 0.3×	13	451
Peter D. Pioli United States	10	234 0.6×	188 1.1×	65 0.9×	39 0.5×	32 0.6×	22	466
Mario Pujato United States	11	157 0.4×	250 1.5×	111 1.5×	86 1.2×	28 0.5×	20	594
Séverine Ménoret France	13	307 0.7×	260 1.6×	39 0.5×	90 1.3×	9 0.2×	21	630
Derek Pappas United States	11	145 0.4×	188 1.1×	67 0.9×	58 0.8×	26 0.5×	18	443
Camille M. Syrett United States	12	312 0.8×	314 1.9×	54 0.8×	211 3.0×	26 0.5×	13	737

Countries citing papers authored by Piper Treuting

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Piper Treuting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Piper Treuting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Piper Treuting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Piper Treuting

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Piper Treuting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Piper Treuting. The network helps show where Piper Treuting may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Piper Treuting

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Piper Treuting. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Piper Treuting based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Piper Treuting. Piper Treuting is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Gurbatri, Candice R., Rosa L. Vincent, Courtney Coker, et al.. (2020). Abstract 6248: Engineered probiotics for local delivery of checkpoint blockade nanobodies. Cancer Research. 80(16_Supplement). 6248–6248. 5 indexed citations

2.

Feng, Yongqiang, Joris van der Veeken, Mikhail Shugay, et al.. (2015). A mechanism for expansion of regulatory T-cell repertoire and its role in self-tolerance. Nature. 528(7580). 132–136. 118 indexed citations

3.

Miao, Edward A., Irina A. Leaf, Piper Treuting, et al.. (2011). Caspase-1-induced pyroptosis is an innate immune effector mechanism against intracellular bacteria (111.33). The Journal of Immunology. 186(1_Supplement). 111.33–111.33. 21 indexed citations

4.

Enns, Linda C., John Morton, Piper Treuting, et al.. (2010). Correction: Disruption of Protein Kinase A in Mice Enhances Healthy Aging. PLoS ONE. 5(2). 1 indexed citations

5.

Enns, Linda C., John Morton, Piper Treuting, et al.. (2010). Correction: Disruption of Protein Kinase A in Mice Enhances Healthy Aging. PLoS ONE. 5(2). 1 indexed citations

6.

Enns, Linda C., John Morton, Piper Treuting, et al.. (2009). Disruption of Protein Kinase A in Mice Enhances Healthy Aging. PLoS ONE. 4(6). e5963–e5963. 84 indexed citations

7.

Takemaru, Ken‐Ichi, Piper Treuting, Damon Love, et al.. (2009). Inactivation of Chibby affects function of motile airway cilia. The Journal of Cell Biology. 185(2). 225–233. 77 indexed citations

8.

Sather, Blythe, Piper Treuting, Nikole Perdue, et al.. (2007). Altering the distribution of Foxp3+ regulatory T cells results in tissue-specific inflammatory disease. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 204(6). 1335–1347. 328 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact