Ping-Shine Shaw

1.1k citations
48 papers · 850 indexed · h-index 13

Ping-Shine Shaw

43 papers receiving 813 citations

Peers

Ping-Shine Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Water Science and Technology 226
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 121
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 175
  • Radiation 76
  • Atmospheric Science 137
Replace А. В. Пономарев with:
А. В. Пономарев Russia
E. Andrade Brazil
Claude Creemers Belgium
J. Perkowski Poland
Michael R. Winchester United States
Denis Mangin France
R. K. Skogerboe United States
Martin E. Schimpf United States
Jin-Hong Chen United States
Nerea Bordel Spain
Ping-Shine Shaw relative to А. В. Пономарев Russia А. В. Пономарев's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
А. В. Пономарев · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping-Shine Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping-Shine Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping-Shine Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping-Shine Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping-Shine Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping-Shine Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping-Shine Shaw. The network helps show where Ping-Shine Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping-Shine Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping-Shine Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Ping-Shine Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20223
3 201813
4 20164
5
Determination of the quantum yield of the ferrioxalate and KI/KIO3 actinometers and a method for the calibration of radiometer detectors | NIST
20113
6 201015
7 201013
8 200714
9 200613
10 200516
11
40 Years of Metrology With Synchrotron Radiation at SURF
20031
12 20025
13 20026
14 199932
15 19993
16 199817
17
The SeaWiFS Quality Monitor: A Portable Field Calibration Light Source
19979
18 19963
19 19934
20 198758

About Ping-Shine Shaw

Ping-Shine Shaw is a scholar working on Radiation, Surfaces, Coatings and Films and Atmospheric Science, having authored 48 papers that have together received 850 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Calibration and Measurement Techniques (29 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (21 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (10 papers), Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (9 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (5 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (5 papers) and Radiative Heat Transfer Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (226 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (121 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (175 citations). Ping-Shine Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Keith R. Lykke, Mihaela I. Stefan, James R. Bolton, Ronald O. Rahn, Uwe Arp, Rajeev Gupta, Richard M. Osgood, Robert R. Krchnavek, H. H. Gilgen and S. H. Southworth. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Journal of Applied Physics and Physical Review A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026