Ping Lv
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
- MicroRNA in disease regulation
Papers in
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 12
- RNA modifications and cancer 4
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 19
- Ion Channels and Receptors 6
- Co-authors
- Ebenezer N. Yamoah (15 shared papers)Haitao Shen (20 shared papers)Hongxia Fan (4 shared papers)Xiaopei Zhao (4 shared papers)Hyo Jeong Kim (8 shared papers)Min Liu (3 shared papers)Hua Tang (3 shared papers)Dongguang Wei (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neurophysiology (4 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (3 papers)Journal of Neuroscience (3 papers)Food and Chemical Toxicology (2 papers)Cancer Letters (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ping Lv
49 papers receiving 904 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Sensory Systems 217
- Cancer Research 336
- Molecular Biology 560
- Neurology 59
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 93
Countries citing papers authored by Ping Lv
This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Lv's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Lv with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Lv more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Lv
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Lv. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Lv. The network helps show where Ping Lv may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Lv, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 112 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 56 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 16 |
About Ping Lv
Ping Lv is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Sensory Systems, Cancer Research, Immunology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 51 papers that have together received 914 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (19 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (12 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (6 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (5 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (4 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (217 citations), Cancer Research (336 citations), Molecular Biology (560 citations), Neurology (59 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (93 citations). Ping Lv has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ebenezer N. Yamoah, Haitao Shen, Hongxia Fan, Xiaopei Zhao, Hyo Jeong Kim, Min Liu, Hua Tang, Dongguang Wei, Jing Lv and Jingyi Fan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Neuroscience, Food and Chemical Toxicology and Cancer Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.