Pia Tio

2.1k total citations · 3 hit papers
5 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Pia Tio is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Pia Tio has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Pia Tio's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers). Pia Tio is often cited by papers focused on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers). Pia Tio collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Pia Tio's co-authors include Denny Borsboom, Claudia D. van Borkulo, Lynn Boschloo, Lourens Waldorp, Robert A. Schoevers, Riet van Bork, Jolanda J. Kossakowski, Jolanda Kossakowski, Sacha Epskamp and Claudi Bockting and has published in prestigious journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Psychological Methods and International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research.

In The Last Decade

Pia Tio

4 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.

2022 648 citations Claudia D. van Borkulo, Riet van Bork et al. Psychological Methods profile →
Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test

2017 379 citations Claudia D. van Borkulo, Lynn Boschloo et al. profile →
Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice

2021 152 citations Laura F. Bringmann, Casper J. Albers et al. Behaviour Research and Therapy profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Pia Tio Netherlands	4	1.1k	555	353	228	211	5	1.2k
Ruofan Ma United States	9	833 0.8×	388 0.7×	385 1.1×	161 0.7×	151 0.7×	16	1.0k
Kean J. Hsu United States	14	937 0.9×	425 0.8×	605 1.7×	161 0.7×	161 0.8×	34	1.4k
Jolanda J. Kossakowski Netherlands	6	699 0.6×	324 0.6×	228 0.6×	122 0.5×	121 0.6×	8	816
Ria H. A. Hoekstra Netherlands	5	691 0.6×	326 0.6×	260 0.7×	134 0.6×	129 0.6×	10	788
Michelle N. Servaas Netherlands	17	881 0.8×	610 1.1×	414 1.2×	90 0.4×	312 1.5×	27	1.4k
Date C. van der Veen Netherlands	16	596 0.5×	253 0.5×	353 1.0×	83 0.4×	148 0.7×	25	900
Alba Contreras Spain	12	448 0.4×	218 0.4×	346 1.0×	90 0.4×	99 0.5×	31	838
Jolanda Kossakowski Netherlands	6	505 0.5×	255 0.5×	216 0.6×	117 0.5×	114 0.5×	11	602
Gwyneth W. Y. Wu United States	8	394 0.4×	225 0.4×	242 0.7×	134 0.6×	79 0.4×	15	834
Lotte H.J.M. Lemmens Netherlands	17	733 0.7×	216 0.4×	542 1.5×	83 0.4×	120 0.6×	45	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Pia Tio

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pia Tio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pia Tio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pia Tio more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pia Tio

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pia Tio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pia Tio. The network helps show where Pia Tio may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pia Tio

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pia Tio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pia Tio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pia Tio. Pia Tio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Borkulo, Claudia D. van, Riet van Bork, Lynn Boschloo, et al.. (2022). Supplemental Material for Comparing Network Structures on Three Aspects: A Permutation Test. Psychological Methods.

2.

Borkulo, Claudia D. van, Riet van Bork, Lynn Boschloo, et al.. (2022). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test.. Psychological Methods. 28(6). 1273–1285. 648 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Bringmann, Laura F., Casper J. Albers, Claudi Bockting, et al.. (2021). Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 149. 104011–104011. 152 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Borkulo, Claudia D. van, Lynn Boschloo, Jolanda Kossakowski, et al.. (2017). Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. 379 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Tio, Pia, Sacha Epskamp, Arjen Noordhof, & Denny Borsboom. (2016). Mapping the manuals of madness: Comparing the ICD-10 and DSM-IV-TR using a network approach. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 25(4). 267–276. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact