Pia Tio
Impact in
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
-
- Mental Health Research Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 3
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 3
- Co-authors
- Denny Borsboom (5 shared papers)Lynn Boschloo (3 shared papers)Robert A. Schoevers (3 shared papers)Claudia D. van Borkulo (3 shared papers)Lourens Waldorp (3 shared papers)Riet van Bork (2 shared papers)Jolanda J. Kossakowski (1 shared paper)Jolanda Kossakowski (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychological Methods (2 papers)International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research (1 paper)Behaviour Research and Therapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Pia Tio
4 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Pia Tio's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Biological Psychiatry 228
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 555
- Applied Psychology 102
- Clinical Psychology 353
Countries citing papers authored by Pia Tio
This map shows the geographic impact of Pia Tio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pia Tio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pia Tio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pia Tio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pia Tio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pia Tio. The network helps show where Pia Tio may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Pia Tio, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test. Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 648 |
| 2 | Comparing network structures on three aspects: A permutation test Hit paper breakdown → | 2017 | 379 |
| 3 | Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice Hit paper breakdown → | 2021 | 152 |
| 4 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 0 |
About Pia Tio
Pia Tio is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Philosophy and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 5 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (228 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (555 citations), Applied Psychology (102 citations) and Clinical Psychology (353 citations). Pia Tio has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Denny Borsboom, Lynn Boschloo, Robert A. Schoevers, Claudia D. van Borkulo, Lourens Waldorp, Riet van Bork, Jolanda J. Kossakowski, Jolanda Kossakowski, Sacha Epskamp and Eva Ceulemans. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Methods, International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research and Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.