Phillip Knightley
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Communication top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- History top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Topics
- Military History and Strategy (4 papers)Australian History and Society (2 papers)Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Phillip Knightley
18 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Sociology and Political Science 168
- Communication 129
- Political Science and International Relations 115
- History 55
- Philosophy 46
Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Knightley
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Knightley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Knightley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Knightley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Knightley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Knightley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Knightley. The network helps show where Phillip Knightley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip Knightley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip Knightley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip Knightley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip Knightley. Phillip Knightley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | An Affair of State: The Profumo Case and the Framing of Stephen Ward | 3 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | The Eye of War: Words and Photographs from the Front Line | 2 |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Australia : A Biography of a Nation | 11 |
| 9 | The First Casualty: the War Correspondent as Hero and Myth-maker from the Crimea to Kosovo | 89 |
| 10 | A Hack's Progress | 5 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | The second oldest profession | 13 |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | The First Casualty: The War Correspondent as Hero, Propagandist, and Myth Maker from the Crimea to Vietnam | 27 |
| 18 | The pearl of days: An intimate memoir of the Sunday Times, 1822-1972 | 4 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | The Philby conspiracy | 5 |
About Phillip Knightley
Phillip Knightley is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Military History and Strategy (4 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (129 citations), History (55 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (115 citations). Phillip Knightley has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sandi E. Cooper, Caroline Kennedy, Bruce R. Page, David C. Leitch, John Keegan and Edward W. Said. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Journalism Studies and Journalism Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.