Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence.
This map shows the geographic impact of John Keegan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Keegan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Keegan more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Keegan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Keegan. The network helps show where John Keegan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Keegan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Keegan.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Keegan based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Keegan. John Keegan is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Keegan, John. (2006). Atlas of world war II. Collins eBooks.1 indexed citations
2.
Knightley, Phillip, et al.. (2003). The Eye of War: Words and Photographs from the Front Line. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
3.
Kennedy, Hugh & John Keegan. (2002). Mongols, Huns and Vikings: Nomads at War. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
4.
Keegan, John. (2001). War and our world.6 indexed citations
5.
Keegan, John, et al.. (2000). Der Erste Weltkrieg : eine europäische Tragödie.1 indexed citations
6.
Keegan, John. (2000). There's Rosemary for Remembrance.. The American Educator. 24(1). 34–44.
7.
Keegan, John, et al.. (2000). The First World War. Naval War College review. 53(2). 248.22 indexed citations
8.
Black, Jeremy & John Keegan. (1999). Warfare in the Eighteenth Century.6 indexed citations
Keegan, John. (1999). The Book of War. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
11.
Keegan, John. (1998). War and Our World: The Reith Lectures 1998. Medical Entomology and Zoology.7 indexed citations
12.
Keegan, John. (1997). Die Kultur des Krieges.11 indexed citations
13.
Keegan, John. (1995). Warpaths: Travels of a Military Historian in North America. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
14.
Gabriel, Richard A., et al.. (1992). From ancient times to the Middle Ages. Greenwood Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
15.
Hanson, Victor Davis, et al.. (1990). Le modèle occidental de la Guerre : la bataille d'infanterie dans la Grèce classique. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).
16.
Keegan, John. (1983). Six armies in Normandy : from D-Day to the liberation of Paris. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).9 indexed citations
17.
Keegan, John, et al.. (1983). Six Armies in Normandy. Naval War College review. 36(4). 17.1 indexed citations
18.
Keegan, John. (1981). Die Schlacht : Azincourt 1415, Waterloo 1815, Somme 1916. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag eBooks.1 indexed citations
19.
Keegan, John, et al.. (1981). The Nature of War.5 indexed citations
20.
Keegan, John. (1977). Encyclopedia of World War II.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.