Phillip Clegg
Impact in
- Geology top 2%
- 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
- Geophysics top 5%
- earthquake and tectonic studies
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- High-pressure geophysics and materials
Papers in
-
- Geological Modeling and Analysis 6
- Geology 5
- Geological and Geophysical Studies 3
- 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage 2
- Co-authors
- Richard R. JonesR. E. HoldsworthKen McCaffreyEnrico TavarnelliRobert W. WilsonNicolas S. HollimanJonathan B. ImberImmo Trinks
- Journals
- Journal of the Geological Society (3 papers)Journal of Structural Geology (3 papers)Computers & Geosciences (2 papers)Geological Magazine (1 paper)Eos (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyAustralia
In The Last Decade
Phillip Clegg
14 papers receiving 834 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Geology 220
- Geophysics 454
- Geochemistry and Petrology 179
- Space and Planetary Science 34
- Earth-Surface Processes 87
Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Clegg
This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Clegg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Clegg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Clegg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Clegg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Clegg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Clegg. The network helps show where Phillip Clegg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Phillip Clegg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 27 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 117 | |
| 4 | Quantifying Fold and Fracture Attributes Using Real Time Kinematic (RTK) GPS and Laser- Scanning | 2006 | 1 |
| 5 | 2006 | 63 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 202 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 54 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 174 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 49 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 69 |
About Phillip Clegg
Phillip Clegg is a scholar working on Geochemistry and Petrology, Geology, Space and Planetary Science, Geophysics and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 14 papers that have together received 861 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6 papers), Geological Modeling and Analysis (6 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (6 papers), Geological and Geophysical Studies (3 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (2 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (2 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (2 papers) and Seismic Waves and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geology (220 citations), Geophysics (454 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (179 citations), Space and Planetary Science (34 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (87 citations). Phillip Clegg has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard R. Jones, R. E. Holdsworth, Ken McCaffrey, Enrico Tavarnelli, Robert W. Wilson, Nicolas S. Holliman, Jonathan B. Imber, Immo Trinks, Roberto Vizeu Lima Pinheiro and Mauro De Donatis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Geological Society, Journal of Structural Geology, Computers & Geosciences, Geological Magazine and Eos.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.