Countries where authors publish in Journal of the Geological Society
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the Geological Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the Geological Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the Geological Society more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of the Geological Society
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the Geological Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the Geological Society.
About Journal of the Geological Society
The 4.7k papers published in Journal of the Geological Society in the last decades have received a total of 214.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of the Geological Society usually cover Geophysics (3.2k papers), Geology (834 papers) and Paleontology (1.0k papers) specifically the topics of Geological and Geochemical Analysis (2.8k papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (1.8k papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (1.4k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the Geological Society are Richard H. Sibson, M. P. Searle, Brian F. Windley, Hugh C. Jenkyns, Alfred Kröner, A. Hallam, L. R. M. Cocks, Michael Brown, Gombosuren Badarch and R. E. Holdsworth.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.