Philippe Tessier

521 citations
34 papers · 366 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Philippe Tessier

32 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Philippe Tessier
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Transplantation 16
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • General Health Professions 88
  • Clinical Psychology 70
  • Demography 37
Replace Gorka Vuletić with:
Gorka Vuletić Croatia
Audrey Irvine United States
Christopher Barrick United States
Kristopher Lamore France
Sam Watts United Kingdom
Marne L. Sherman United States
Marc Hamel Canada
Ceinwen E. Cumming Canada
Zuraida Ahmad Sabki Malaysia
Amy L. Mirand United States
Philippe Tessier relative to Gorka Vuletić Croatia Gorka Vuletić's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Gorka Vuletić · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philippe Tessier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philippe Tessier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philippe Tessier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philippe Tessier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philippe Tessier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philippe Tessier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philippe Tessier. The network helps show where Philippe Tessier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philippe Tessier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philippe Tessier Line = papers co-authored together Philippe Tessier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201170
2
Treatment of major affective disorder with fluvoxamine.
198753
3 201224
4 200523
5 201620
6 201518
7 200518
8 202015
9 201915
10 201614
11 200514
12 201613
13 20058
14 20187
15 20217
16 20116
17 20226
18 20184
19 20194
20 20054

About Philippe Tessier

Philippe Tessier is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 34 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (12 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (16 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations), General Health Professions (88 citations), Clinical Psychology (70 citations) and Demography (37 citations). Philippe Tessier has collaborated with scholars based in France, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Angélique Bonnaud‐Antignac, Sophie Lelorain, François‐Charles Wolff, Agnès Florin, Véronique Sebille, Claudine Attias-Donfut, Claudine Attias‐Donfut, Myriam Blanchin, Yohann Foucher and Michael W. Browne. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, BMC Nephrology, BMJ Open and Health Economics Policy and Law.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact