Nicolas Sirven
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Thierry DebrandThomas RappJérôme BalletMélanie Requier-DesjardinsZeynep OrFlorence JusotCatherine SermetMarie Herr
- Topics
- Global Health Care Issues (11 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (11 papers)Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nicolas Sirven
39 papers receiving 781 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- General Health Professions 291
- Health 283
- Sociology and Political Science 217
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 201
- Economics and Econometrics 182
Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Sirven
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Sirven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Sirven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Sirven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Sirven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Sirven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Sirven. The network helps show where Nicolas Sirven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicolas Sirven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicolas Sirven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicolas Sirven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicolas Sirven. Nicolas Sirven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Les travailleurs indépendants sous-investissent-ils dans leur santé ? | 0 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 81 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 90 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 72 | |
| 14 | 67 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | Core Labour Standards and Inequalities: Is There a Social Kuznets Curve? | 1 |
| 17 | 170 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Nicolas Sirven
Nicolas Sirven is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 45 papers that have together received 826 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Care Issues (11 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (11 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (201 citations), Health (283 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (47 citations). Nicolas Sirven has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thierry Debrand, Thomas Rapp, Jérôme Ballet, Mélanie Requier-Desjardins, Zeynep Or, Florence Jusot, Catherine Sermet, Marie Herr, Pauline Chauvin and Jean‐Marie Cardebat. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Social Indicators Research and Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.