Philipp Strack

1.8k citations
79 papers · 911 indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Philipp Strack

75 papers receiving 881 citations

Peers

Philipp Strack
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • General Decision Sciences 231
  • Management Science and Operations Research 426
  • Safety Research 251
  • Finance 145
  • Economics and Econometrics 385
Replace Federico Echenique with:
Federico Echenique United States
Jean‐François Mertens Belgium
Kfir Eliaz United States
Jeffrey C. Ely United States
Jürgen Eichberger Germany
Tomasz Strzalecki United States
Ed Hopkins United Kingdom
Elyès Jouini France
David M. Pennock United States
Aurélien Baillon Netherlands
Philipp Strack relative to Federico Echenique United States Federico Echenique's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Federico Echenique · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Strack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Strack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Strack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Strack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Strack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Strack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Strack. The network helps show where Philipp Strack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Strack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Strack Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Strack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018100
2 201875
3 201564
4 201741
5 201936
6 202035
7 202035
8 201728
9 201326
10 201526
11 201523
12 201721
13 201521
14 202121
15 201519
16 202019
17 201518
18 201718
19 202116
20 202316

About Philipp Strack

Philipp Strack is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, General Decision Sciences and Marketing, having authored 79 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auction Theory and Applications (32 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (23 papers), Economic theories and models (20 papers), Game Theory and Applications (18 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (16 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (14 papers), Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research (7 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (231 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (426 citations), Safety Research (251 citations), Finance (145 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (385 citations). Philipp Strack has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Drew Fudenberg, Sebastian Ebert, Tomasz Strzalecki, Paul Heidhues, Thomas Kruse, Botond Kőszegi, Benny Moldovanu, Jacob D. Leshno, Alex Gershkov and Dirk Bergemann. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Economics, Econometrica, American Economic Review, Journal of Political Economy and Journal of Economic Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact