Philipp Doebler

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
75 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Philipp Doebler is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Philipp Doebler has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 16 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 16 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Philipp Doebler's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (14 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (8 papers) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (8 papers). Philipp Doebler is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (14 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (8 papers) and Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (8 papers). Philipp Doebler collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Iran and United States. Philipp Doebler's co-authors include Thomas Ehring, Janna Nelson, Heinz Holling, Harald Baumeister, David Daniel Ebert, Boris Forthmann, Paul‐Christian Bürkner, Stephan Nüesch, Christian Rupp and Sally Olderbak and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Philipp Doebler

65 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Childhood maltreatment an... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 100 200 300 400 500

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philipp Doebler 683 532 300 296 230 75 1.8k
David M. Erceg‐Hurn 618 0.9× 436 0.8× 182 0.6× 244 0.8× 146 0.6× 33 1.4k
Luís Eduardo Garrido 388 0.6× 487 0.9× 149 0.5× 251 0.8× 191 0.8× 46 1.4k
Satoshi Usami 649 1.0× 435 0.8× 106 0.4× 402 1.4× 115 0.5× 110 1.9k
Tom Loeys 642 0.9× 443 0.8× 183 0.6× 554 1.9× 302 1.3× 135 2.9k
Marjolein Fokkema 427 0.6× 320 0.6× 192 0.6× 242 0.8× 132 0.6× 47 1.4k
Tanja Lischetzke 598 0.9× 778 1.5× 363 1.2× 708 2.4× 232 1.0× 56 2.0k
Diane Losardo 892 1.3× 498 0.9× 84 0.3× 244 0.8× 270 1.2× 7 1.6k
Sarah K. Schäfer 574 0.8× 442 0.8× 119 0.4× 255 0.9× 203 0.9× 82 1.7k
Chris Leach 1.2k 1.8× 516 1.0× 241 0.8× 612 2.1× 204 0.9× 78 2.4k
Madeline Pe 545 0.8× 1.2k 2.3× 260 0.9× 319 1.1× 541 2.4× 51 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Doebler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Doebler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Doebler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Doebler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Doebler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Doebler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Doebler. The network helps show where Philipp Doebler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philipp Doebler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philipp Doebler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philipp Doebler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philipp Doebler. Philipp Doebler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Lauermann, Fani, et al.. (2025). Putting the pieces of the puzzle together in modeling gendered educational choices. International Journal of STEM Education. 12(1). 2 indexed citations
3.
Forthmann, Boris, Philipp Doebler, & Rüdiger Mutz. (2024). Why summing up bibliometric indicators does not justify a composite indicator. Scientometrics. 129(12). 7475–7499. 2 indexed citations
4.
Starke, Christopher, Meeyoung Cha, Philipp Doebler, et al.. (2024). Risks and protective measures for synthetic relationships. Nature Human Behaviour. 8(10). 1834–1836. 8 indexed citations
5.
Forthmann, Boris, et al.. (2024). Reliable individual differences in researcher performance capacity estimates: evaluating productivity as explanatory variable. Scientometrics. 130(1). 43–66. 1 indexed citations
7.
Doebler, Philipp, et al.. (2024). Myopia prevalence, refractive status and uncorrected myopia among primary and secondary school students in Germany. Frontiers in Medicine. 11. 1483069–1483069.
8.
Doebler, Philipp, et al.. (2024). Towards Highly Efficient Anomaly Detection for Predictive Maintenance. 1691–1696. 1 indexed citations
9.
Doebler, Philipp, P Kern, Corinna Reck, et al.. (2024). Parent–child interactive behavior in a German sample of parents with and without a mental illness: model replication and adaption of the Coding Interactive Behavior system. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 15. 1266383–1266383. 2 indexed citations
11.
Huang, He, et al.. (2022). The Machines Take Over: A Comparison of Various Supervised Learning Approaches for Automated Scoring of Divergent Thinking Tasks. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 57(1). 17–36. 22 indexed citations
12.
Doebler, Philipp, et al.. (2021). Interests, Motives, and Psychological Burdens in Times of Crisis and Lockdown: Google Trends Analysis to Inform Policy Makers. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(6). e26385–e26385. 12 indexed citations
13.
Doebler, Philipp, et al.. (2021). Statistical modeling of dynamic eye-tracking experiments: Relative importance of visual stimulus elements for gaze behavior in the multi-group case. Behavior Research Methods. 53(6). 2650–2667. 1 indexed citations
14.
Doebler, Philipp, Lena Steubl, Matthias Domhardt, et al.. (2020). Effectiveness of Internet- and Mobile-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(14). 5179–5179. 6 indexed citations
15.
Revelle, William, et al.. (2020). Using the International Cognitive Ability Resource as an open source tool to explore individual differences in cognitive ability. Personality and Individual Differences. 169. 109906–109906. 40 indexed citations
16.
Wartlick, Ortrud, et al.. (2020). Comparison of Recent Acceleration Techniques for the EM Algorithm in One- and Two-Parameter Logistic IRT Models. Psych. 2(4). 209–252. 5 indexed citations
17.
Doebler, Philipp, et al.. (2020). Comparison of random‐effects meta‐analysis models for the relative risk in the case of rare events: A simulation study. Biometrical Journal. 62(7). 1597–1630. 19 indexed citations
18.
Rupp, Christian, et al.. (2019). A randomized waitlist-controlled trial comparing detached mindfulness and cognitive restructuring in obsessive-compulsive disorder. PLoS ONE. 14(3). e0213895–e0213895. 21 indexed citations
19.
Nelson, Janna, et al.. (2018). Everyday emotional dynamics in major depression.. Emotion. 20(2). 179–191. 48 indexed citations
20.
Rupp, Christian, Philipp Doebler, Thomas Ehring, & Anna N. Vossbeck‐Elsebusch. (2016). Emotional Processing Theory Put to Test: A Meta‐Analysis on the Association Between Process and Outcome Measures in Exposure Therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 24(3). 697–711. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026