Philipp Berger

416 citations
21 papers · 210 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Philipp Berger

18 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers

Philipp Berger
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 89
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 62
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 53
  • Social Psychology 55
  • Clinical Psychology 51
Replace Beier Yao with:
Beier Yao United States
Marie‐Charlotte Gandolphe France
Ting Yat Wong Hong Kong
Pavla Linhartová Czechia
Felicity Deamer United Kingdom
Peter Moormann Netherlands
Christoffer Rahm Sweden
Carl Michael Galang Canada
Carrington Merritt United States
Lydia Hickman United Kingdom
Philipp Berger relative to Beier Yao United States Beier Yao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Beier Yao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philipp Berger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philipp Berger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philipp Berger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philipp Berger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philipp Berger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philipp Berger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philipp Berger. The network helps show where Philipp Berger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Philipp Berger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philipp Berger Line = papers co-authored together Philipp Berger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201836
2 201827
3 201922
4 201722
5 199818
6 201814
7 201713
8 202211
9 20208
10 20217
11 20226
12 20226
13 20216
14 20244
15 20213
16 20213
17 20183
18 20211
19 20250
20 20250

About Philipp Berger

Philipp Berger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Humor Studies and Applications (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (2 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (89 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (62 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (53 citations), Social Psychology (55 citations) and Clinical Psychology (51 citations). Philipp Berger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Irina Falkenberg, Arne Nagels, Benjamin Straube, Charlotte Grosse Wiesmann, David Buttelmann, Angela D. Friederici, Mirjam Schneider, K. Meszaros, Theodore Reich and H.N. Aschauer. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Schizophrenia Research, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Developmental Science and International Journal of Play.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact