Philip Wong
- Spectroscopy top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Analytical Chemistry top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Co-authors
- R. Graham CooksShuguang MaPeter T. KissingerDavid V. DeardenYongxin ZhuManish SoniChristopher JamesSheng Sheng Yang
- Topics
- Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (15 papers)Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (13 papers)Analytical chemistry methods development (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyAccounts of Chemical ResearchEnvironmental Science & Technology
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Philip Wong
41 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Spectroscopy 689
- Molecular Biology 243
- Organic Chemistry 200
- Analytical Chemistry 194
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 189
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Wong. The network helps show where Philip Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Wong. Philip Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 68 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry | 8 |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Philip Wong
Philip Wong is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Analytical Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (15 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (13 papers) and Analytical chemistry methods development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (689 citations), Analytical Chemistry (194 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (93 citations). Philip Wong has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include R. Graham Cooks, Shuguang Ma, Peter T. Kissinger, David V. Dearden, Yongxin Zhu, Manish Soni, Christopher James, Sheng Sheng Yang, J. W. Amy and P. B. Shepson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Accounts of Chemical Research and Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.