John A. Scott
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Parker MaginKim HendersonSimon MorganMieke van DrielAmanda TapleyNeil SpikeLawrie McArthurJean Ball
- Topics
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers)Healthcare Systems and Technology (6 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomMalaysia
In The Last Decade
John A. Scott
23 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- General Health Professions 182
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 133
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 73
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 59
- Epidemiology 58
Countries citing papers authored by John A. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Scott. The network helps show where John A. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John A. Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John A. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John A. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John A. Scott. John A. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | The Registrars' Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) project: Educational and research aspects of documenting general practice trainees' clinical experience | 28 |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | Prevalence of skin disease among staff in an Australian nursing home | 2 |
| 20 | 1 |
About John A. Scott
John A. Scott is a scholar working on Family Practice, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Anatomy, having authored 25 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Healthcare Systems and Technology (6 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (59 citations), Family Practice (34 citations) and General Health Professions (182 citations). John A. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Parker Magin, Kim Henderson, Simon Morgan, Mieke van Driel, Amanda Tapley, Neil Spike, Lawrie McArthur, Jean Ball, Susan Goode and Catherine Regan. Their work appears in journals such as EBioMedicine, Family Practice and BMC Medical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.