Philip W. Bush
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Robert E. DrakeRobin E. ClarkGregory B. TeagueGregory J. McHugoStephen J. BartelsRob WhitleyKristin M. KostickHaiyi Xie
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Philip W. Bush
10 papers receiving 618 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Psychiatry and Mental health 381
- General Health Professions 280
- Social Psychology 278
- Clinical Psychology 209
- Epidemiology 187
Countries citing papers authored by Philip W. Bush
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip W. Bush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip W. Bush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip W. Bush more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip W. Bush
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip W. Bush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip W. Bush. The network helps show where Philip W. Bush may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip W. Bush
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip W. Bush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip W. Bush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip W. Bush. Philip W. Bush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 103 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | Cost-effectiveness of assertive community treatment versus standard case management for persons with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorders. | 81 |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | Substance abuse in schizophrenia: service utilization and costs | 166 |
| 10 | 167 |
About Philip W. Bush
Philip W. Bush is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (8 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (381 citations), Social Psychology (278 citations) and General Health Professions (280 citations). Philip W. Bush has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Drake, Robin E. Clark, Gregory B. Teague, Gregory J. McHugo, Stephen J. Bartels, Rob Whitley, Kristin M. Kostick, Haiyi Xie, William Haslett and Deborah R. Becker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Psychiatric Services and Journal of Mental Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.