Philip Titcombe
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
-
- Birth, Development, and Health
Papers in
-
- Birth, Development, and Health 4
-
- Gestational Diabetes Research and Management 3
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies 2
- Co-authors
- Keith M. Godfrey (12 shared papers)Sheila J. Barton (11 shared papers)Karen A. Lillycrop (7 shared papers)Robert Murray (7 shared papers)Cyrus Cooper (9 shared papers)Hazel Inskip (6 shared papers)Joanna D. Holbrook (4 shared papers)Nicholas C. Harvey (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Epigenetics (2 papers)PLoS Medicine (2 papers)Nutrients (1 paper)Clinical Epigenetics (1 paper)Hypertension (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSingaporeNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Philip Titcombe
14 papers receiving 243 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 51
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 72
- Cancer Research 33
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 13
- Molecular Biology 111
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Titcombe
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Titcombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Titcombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Titcombe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Titcombe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Titcombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Titcombe. The network helps show where Philip Titcombe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Titcombe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 68 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2024 | 1 |
About Philip Titcombe
Philip Titcombe is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Birth, Development, and Health (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (3 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper) and Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (51 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (72 citations), Cancer Research (33 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (13 citations) and Molecular Biology (111 citations). Philip Titcombe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Keith M. Godfrey, Sheila J. Barton, Karen A. Lillycrop, Robert Murray, Cyrus Cooper, Hazel Inskip, Joanna D. Holbrook, Nicholas C. Harvey, Emma Garratt and Mark A. Hanson. Their work appears in journals such as Epigenetics, PLoS Medicine, Nutrients, Clinical Epigenetics and Hypertension.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.