Clinical Epigenetics

1.8k papers and 46.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Clinical Epigenetics in the last decades have received a total of 46.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Epigenetics usually cover Molecular Biology (1.4k papers), Cancer Research (333 papers) and Genetics (316 papers) specifically the topics of Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1.2k papers), RNA modifications and cancer (225 papers) and Cancer-related gene regulation (216 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Epigenetics are Hermann Brenner, Michael Lübbert, Manfred Jung, James Davie, Geneviève P. Delcuve, Dilshad H. Khan, Weimin Fan, Huilin Zheng, Jiaying Shen and Bernd Holleczek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Epigenetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Epigenetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Epigenetics.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Epigenetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Epigenetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Epigenetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Epigenetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025