Countries where authors publish in Clinical Epigenetics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Epigenetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Epigenetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Epigenetics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Clinical Epigenetics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Epigenetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Epigenetics.
About Clinical Epigenetics
The 1.9k papers published in Clinical Epigenetics in the last decades have received a total of 51.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Epigenetics usually cover Cancer Research (356 papers), Molecular Biology (1.5k papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (319 papers), Genetics (328 papers) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (70 papers) specifically the topics of Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1.3k papers), RNA modifications and cancer (246 papers), Cancer-related gene regulation (224 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (213 papers), Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (186 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (159 papers), Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (145 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (128 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Epigenetics are Hermann Brenner, Michael Lübbert, Manfred Jung, James Davie, Geneviève P. Delcuve, Dilshad H. Khan, Jiaying Shen, Huilin Zheng, Weimin Fan and Roberto Berni Canani.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.