Philip Saville
Impact in
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
-
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Papers in
- Surgery 9
- Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques 4
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 4
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment 3
- Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 1
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology 5
- Co-authors
- Vincent Arlet (6 shared papers)Avani S. Vaishnav (4 shared papers)Steven J. McAnany (4 shared papers)Catherine Himo Gang (4 shared papers)Sheeraz A. Qureshi (4 shared papers)Harvey E. Smith (4 shared papers)Nathan A. Wigner (2 shared papers)Brittany E. Haws (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Spine (2 papers)Journal of Neurosurgery Spine (2 papers)Global Spine Journal (2 papers)The Spine Journal (2 papers)Foot & Ankle International (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip Saville
12 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 139
- Surgery 133
- Speech and Hearing 12
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 13
- Health Informatics 1
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Saville
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Saville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Saville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Saville more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Saville
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Saville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Saville. The network helps show where Philip Saville may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Saville, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 59 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 1 |
About Philip Saville
Philip Saville is a scholar working on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 275 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (5 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (4 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (3 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (1 paper), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Tendon Structure and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (139 citations), Surgery (133 citations), Speech and Hearing (12 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (13 citations) and Health Informatics (1 citation). Philip Saville has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Vincent Arlet, Avani S. Vaishnav, Steven J. McAnany, Catherine Himo Gang, Sheeraz A. Qureshi, Harvey E. Smith, Nathan A. Wigner, Brittany E. Haws, Kern Singh and Todd J. Albert. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, Global Spine Journal, The Spine Journal and Foot & Ankle International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.