Foot & Ankle International

5.5k papers and 160.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.5k papers published in Foot & Ankle International in the last decades have received a total of 160.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Foot & Ankle International usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (4.4k papers), Surgery (2.7k papers) and Biomedical Engineering (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Foot and Ankle Surgery (3.8k papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (2.4k papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (1.9k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Foot & Ankle International are Mark S. Myerson, Michael J. Coughlin, James A. Nunley, David B. Thordarson, Michael S. Pinzur, Harold B. Kitaoka, Lew C. Schon, Beat Hintermann, Robert S. Adelaar and Mark E. Easley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Foot & Ankle International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Foot & Ankle International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Foot & Ankle International.

Countries where authors publish in Foot & Ankle International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Foot & Ankle International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Foot & Ankle International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foot & Ankle International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025