Peter Lush

1.2k total citations
22 papers, 491 citations indexed

About

Peter Lush is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Lush has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 491 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 5 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Peter Lush's work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers) and Free Will and Agency (6 papers). Peter Lush is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Placebo Effect (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (8 papers) and Free Will and Agency (6 papers). Peter Lush collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Germany. Peter Lush's co-authors include Zoltán Dienes, Anil K. Seth, Warrick Roseboom, R. B. Y. Scott, Olivier Corneille, Keisuke Suzuki, Jamie Ward, Vanessa Botan, Peter Naish and Axel Cleeremans and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Psychological Science and Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance.

In The Last Decade

Peter Lush

22 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Lush United Kingdom	12	342	160	128	107	84	22	491
Giuseppina Porciello Italy	15	315 0.9×	224 1.4×	187 1.5×	167 1.6×	107 1.3×	33	623
Kai Engbert Germany	7	426 1.2×	194 1.2×	168 1.3×	29 0.3×	63 0.8×	11	557
Ilaria Bufalari Italy	11	264 0.8×	220 1.4×	118 0.9×	217 2.0×	108 1.3×	15	487
Anna Laura Sforza Italy	7	241 0.7×	226 1.4×	96 0.8×	150 1.4×	66 0.8×	7	369
Terje B. Holmlund Norway	12	272 0.8×	62 0.4×	115 0.9×	17 0.2×	179 2.1×	22	454
Peter Robert Cannon New Zealand	9	389 1.1×	299 1.9×	32 0.3×	34 0.3×	174 2.1×	14	571
Mariana Von Mohr United Kingdom	11	238 0.7×	285 1.8×	118 0.9×	65 0.6×	135 1.6×	21	527
Ralph Pawling United Kingdom	8	223 0.7×	132 0.8×	55 0.4×	35 0.3×	118 1.4×	14	345
Camila Valenzuela-Moguillansky Chile	8	167 0.5×	134 0.8×	152 1.2×	61 0.6×	83 1.0×	12	398
Eriko Sugimori Japan	12	266 0.8×	158 1.0×	231 1.8×	55 0.5×	90 1.1×	38	461

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lush

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lush

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lush. The network helps show where Peter Lush may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Lush

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Lush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Lush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Lush. Peter Lush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Corneille, Olivier, Anne Gast, Peter Lush, & Christoph Stahl. (2025). Evaluative Conditioning has a Vexing Demand Problem. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 19(8). 1 indexed citations

Dance, Carla, et al.. (2024). Investigating Relationships Between Trait Visual Imagery and Phenomenological Control: The Role of Context Effects. Collabra Psychology. 10(1). 4 indexed citations

Corneille, Olivier, Jo Havemann, Emma Henderson, et al.. (2023). Beware ‘persuasive communication devices’ when writing and reading scientific articles. eLife. 12. 11 indexed citations

Dienes, Zoltán & Peter Lush. (2023). The Role of Phenomenological Control in Experience. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 32(2). 145–151. 8 indexed citations

Corneille, Olivier, Harriet A. Carroll, Jo Havemann, et al.. (2022). Reflecting on the use of persuasive communication devices in academic writing. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations

Roseboom, Warrick & Peter Lush. (2022). Serious Problems With Interpreting Rubber Hand “Illusion” Experiments. Collabra Psychology. 8(1). 7 indexed citations

Lush, Peter, Anil K. Seth, & Zoltán Dienes. (2021). Hypothesis awareness confounds asynchronous control conditions in indirect measures of the rubber hand illusion. Royal Society Open Science. 8(11). 210911–210911. 16 indexed citations

Lush, Peter, et al.. (2021). Computer versus live delivery of the Sussex Waterloo Scale of Hypnotizability (SWASH).. Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice. 11(2). 209–216. 3 indexed citations

Lush, Peter, R. B. Y. Scott, Anil K. Seth, & Zoltán Dienes. (2021). The Phenomenological Control Scale: Measuring the Capacity for Creating Illusory Nonvolition, Hallucination and Delusion. Collabra Psychology. 7(1). 11 indexed citations

10.

Lush, Peter, Vanessa Botan, R. B. Y. Scott, et al.. (2020). Trait phenomenological control predicts experience of mirror synaesthesia and the rubber hand illusion. Nature Communications. 11(1). 4853–4853. 72 indexed citations

11.

Lush, Peter. (2020). Demand Characteristics Confound the Rubber Hand Illusion. Collabra Psychology. 6(1). 44 indexed citations

12.

Dienes, Zoltán, Peter Lush, Bence Pálfi, et al.. (2020). Phenomenological control as cold control.. Psychology of Consciousness Theory Research and Practice. 9(2). 101–116. 16 indexed citations

13.

Lush, Peter, et al.. (2019). Effect of alcohol on the sense of agency in healthy humans. Addiction Biology. 25(4). e12796–e12796. 6 indexed citations

14.

Lush, Peter, Warrick Roseboom, Axel Cleeremans, et al.. (2019). Intentional binding as Bayesian cue combination: Testing predictions with trait individual differences.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 45(9). 1206–1217. 27 indexed citations

15.

Pálfi, Bence, et al.. (2019). Can hypnotic suggestibility be measured online?. Psychological Research. 84(5). 1460–1471. 14 indexed citations

16.

Lush, Peter & Zoltán Dienes. (2019). Time perception and the experience of agency in meditation and hypnosis. PsyCh Journal. 8(1). 36–50. 11 indexed citations

17.

Lush, Peter, et al.. (2018). The Sussex-Waterloo Scale of Hypnotizability (SWASH): measuring capacity for altering conscious experience. Neuroscience of Consciousness. 2018(1). niy006–niy006. 33 indexed citations

18.

Lush, Peter, Émilie A. Caspar, Axel Cleeremans, et al.. (2017). The Power of Suggestion: Posthypnotically Induced Changes in the Temporal Binding of Intentional Action Outcomes. Psychological Science. 28(5). 661–669. 27 indexed citations

19.

Lush, Peter, Jim Parkinson, & Zoltán Dienes. (2016). Illusory Temporal Binding in Meditators. Mindfulness. 7(6). 1416–1422. 9 indexed citations

20.

Lush, Peter, Peter Naish, & Zoltán Dienes. (2016). Metacognition of intentions in mindfulness and hypnosis. Neuroscience of Consciousness. 2016(1). niw007–niw007. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact