Countries citing papers authored by Philip S. Thomas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip S. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip S. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip S. Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip S. Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip S. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip S. Thomas. The network helps show where Philip S. Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip S. Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip S. Thomas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip S. Thomas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Philip S. Thomas. Philip S. Thomas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Özışık, Pınar & Philip S. Thomas. (2020). Security Analysis of Safe and Seldonian Reinforcement Learning Algorithms. Neural Information Processing Systems. 33. 8959–8970.2 indexed citations
Thomas, Philip S. & Erik Learned-Miller. (2019). Concentration Inequalities for Conditional Value at Risk. International Conference on Machine Learning. 6225–6233.6 indexed citations
9.
Giguere, Stephen, et al.. (2019). Offline Contextual Bandits with High Probability Fairness Guarantees. Neural Information Processing Systems. 32. 14893–14904.13 indexed citations
10.
Hanna, Josiah P., Philip S. Thomas, Peter Stone, & Scott Niekum. (2017). Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation Through Behavior Policy Search. International Conference on Machine Learning. 1394–1403.2 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, Philip S., Bruno Castro da Silva, Christoph Dann, & Emma Brunskill. (2016). Energetic natural gradient descent. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2887–2895.2 indexed citations
12.
Theocharous, Georgios, Philip S. Thomas, & Mohammad Ghavamzadeh. (2015). Personalized ad recommendation systems for life-time value optimization with guarantees. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1806–1812.26 indexed citations
13.
Thomas, Philip S., Georgios Theocharous, & Mohammad Ghavamzadeh. (2015). High Confidence Policy Improvement. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2380–2388.32 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, Philip S., Scott Niekum, Georgios Theocharous, & George Konidaris. (2015). Policy evaluation using the Ω-return. Neural Information Processing Systems. 28. 334–342.1 indexed citations
15.
Thomas, Philip S.. (2014). GeNGA: A Generalization of Natural Gradient Ascent with Positive and Negative Convergence Results. International Conference on Machine Learning. 1575–1583.8 indexed citations
16.
Thomas, Philip S.. (2014). GeNGA: a generalization of natural gradient ascent with positive and. International Conference on Machine Learning.1 indexed citations
17.
Thomas, Philip S., et al.. (2013). Projected Natural Actor-Critic. Neural Information Processing Systems. 26. 2337–2345.9 indexed citations
18.
Thomas, Philip S.. (2011). Policy Gradient Coagent Networks. Neural Information Processing Systems. 24. 1944–1952.3 indexed citations
19.
Thomas, Philip S. & Andrew G. Barto. (2011). Conjugate Markov Decision Processes. International Conference on Machine Learning. 137–144.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.