Philip S. Alexander

1.3k total citations
44 papers, 200 citations indexed

About

Philip S. Alexander is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip S. Alexander has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 200 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Religious studies, 21 papers in Archeology and 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Philip S. Alexander's work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (21 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (18 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers). Philip S. Alexander is often cited by papers focused on Biblical Studies and Interpretation (21 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (18 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers). Philip S. Alexander collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Iran and United States. Philip S. Alexander's co-authors include Emanuel Tov, Leonard Victor Rutgers, John Sharp, Timothy H. Lim, M. Morf, Géza Vermès, Robert Hayward and Sivesh K. Kamarajah and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Behavior Research Methods and Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Philip S. Alexander

35 papers receiving 125 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip S. Alexander United Kingdom 9 122 115 70 22 15 44 200
Marcus Jastrow 3 123 1.0× 158 1.4× 89 1.3× 26 1.2× 25 1.7× 3 246
Michael Sokoloff Switzerland 6 103 0.8× 143 1.2× 76 1.1× 31 1.4× 13 0.9× 19 193
Markus Bockmuehl United Kingdom 8 225 1.8× 152 1.3× 147 2.1× 22 1.0× 38 2.5× 43 301
P. Kyle McCarter United States 8 145 1.2× 129 1.1× 68 1.0× 9 0.4× 8 0.5× 28 205
John C. Reeves United States 8 69 0.6× 100 0.9× 53 0.8× 39 1.8× 14 0.9× 28 142
Günter Stemberger Austria 4 142 1.2× 126 1.1× 116 1.7× 12 0.5× 25 1.7× 40 209
Barbara Aland 8 114 0.9× 51 0.4× 92 1.3× 16 0.7× 13 0.9× 29 156
John Marks 7 49 0.4× 63 0.5× 49 0.7× 23 1.0× 14 0.9× 15 151
Eldon Jay Epp United States 9 163 1.3× 62 0.5× 149 2.1× 19 0.9× 12 0.8× 41 221
Carl R. Holladay United States 6 158 1.3× 84 0.7× 103 1.5× 18 0.8× 19 1.3× 24 192

Countries citing papers authored by Philip S. Alexander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip S. Alexander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip S. Alexander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip S. Alexander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip S. Alexander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip S. Alexander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip S. Alexander. The network helps show where Philip S. Alexander may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip S. Alexander

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip S. Alexander. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip S. Alexander based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip S. Alexander. Philip S. Alexander is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Sharp, John, et al.. (2022). Surgical management of aphakia. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 48(12). 1453–1461. 4 indexed citations
4.
Alexander, Philip S.. (2005). Studia Semitica: The Journal of Semitic Studies Jubilee Volume. Oxford University Press eBooks. 3 indexed citations
5.
Alexander, Philip S.. (1999). From Poetry to Historiography: the Image of the Hasmoneans in Targum Canticles and the Question of the Targum's Provenance and Date. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha. 10(19). 103–128. 1 indexed citations
6.
Alexander, Philip S.. (1999). Jerusalem as the Omphalos of the World: On the History of a Geographical Concept. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 12 indexed citations
7.
Lim, Timothy H., Philip S. Alexander, & Emanuel Tov. (1997). The Dead Sea scrolls electronic reference library. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2 indexed citations
9.
Alexander, Philip S., et al.. (1994). Introduction: Artefact and Text. 1 indexed citations
12.
Alexander, Philip S., et al.. (1987). The Roots of 128: A Hypothetical Documentation Strategy. The American Archivist. 50(4). 518–531. 7 indexed citations
13.
Alexander, Philip S.. (1986). Jesus and JudaismSandersE. P. Jesus and Judaism SCM PressLondon, 1985, 444, £15.00. Journal of Jewish Studies. 37(1). 103–106. 2 indexed citations
15.
Alexander, Philip S.. (1977). A Psychotherapist's Reaction to His Patient's Death. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 7(4). 203–210. 5 indexed citations
16.
Alexander, Philip S.. (1977). The Historical Setting of the Hebrew Book of Enoch. Journal of Jewish Studies. 28(2). 156–180. 16 indexed citations
18.
Alexander, Philip S.. (1974). The toponymy of the targumim with special reference to the table of the nations and the boundaries of the land of Israel. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026