John Marks

633 total citations
15 papers, 151 citations indexed

About

John Marks is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, John Marks has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 151 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Religious studies, 6 papers in Archeology and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in John Marks's work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers). John Marks is often cited by papers focused on Biblical Studies and Interpretation (7 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (5 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers). John Marks collaborates with scholars based in . John Marks's co-authors include John Van Seters, H. J. W. Drijvers, Constantin Boundas, Dorothea Olkowski, Javier Teixidor, J. Alberto Soggin, Louis Finkelstein, William D. Davies and Bruce Bernstein and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine and The Modern Language Review.

In The Last Decade

John Marks

10 papers receiving 106 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Marks	7	63	49	49	23	14	15	151
Gedaliahu A. G. Stroumsa United Kingdom	6	54 0.9×	65 1.3×	57 1.2×	26 1.1×	26 1.9×	18	123
Bentley Layton United States	7	105 1.7×	62 1.3×	87 1.8×	19 0.8×	28 2.0×	24	162
Thomas M. Bolin United States	7	47 0.7×	52 1.1×	50 1.0×	33 1.4×	31 2.2×	14	129
Doron Mendels Israel	7	54 0.9×	55 1.1×	63 1.3×	29 1.3×	11 0.8×	29	120
Barbara Aland	8	51 0.8×	92 1.9×	114 2.3×	16 0.7×	13 0.9×	29	156
Naomi Janowitz United States	7	60 1.0×	36 0.7×	48 1.0×	39 1.7×	23 1.6×	19	121
Kurt Rudolph Germany	5	43 0.7×	41 0.8×	43 0.9×	13 0.6×	48 3.4×	24	112
Geo Widengren	6	38 0.6×	39 0.8×	18 0.4×	36 1.6×	21 1.5×	29	90
Robert Hamerton-Kelly United States	7	31 0.5×	55 1.1×	67 1.4×	14 0.6×	51 3.6×	23	142
E. A. Wallis Budge	7	86 1.4×	37 0.8×	23 0.5×	38 1.7×	4 0.3×	57	158

Countries citing papers authored by John Marks

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Marks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Marks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Marks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Marks

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Marks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Marks. The network helps show where John Marks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Marks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Marks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Marks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Marks. John Marks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Marks, John. (2019). Deleuze and Science. Edinburgh University Press eBooks.

2.

Marks, John. (2006). Introduction. Paragraph. 29(2). 1–18.

3.

Marks, John. (2006). Molecular Biology in the Work of Deleuze and Guattari. Paragraph. 29(2). 81–97.

4.

Marks, John. (1998). Gilles Deleuze. Pluto Press eBooks.

5.

Marks, John, Constantin Boundas, & Dorothea Olkowski. (1996). Gilles Deleuze and the Theater of Philosophy. The Modern Language Review. 91(2). 487–487. 37 indexed citations

6.

Soggin, J. Alberto, et al.. (1990). Love and Death in the Ancient near East: Essays in Honor of Marvin H. Pope. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 110(1). 130–130. 9 indexed citations

7.

Bernstein, Bruce & John Marks. (1986). EPRI Report. IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine. 2(1). 44–45. 2 indexed citations

8.

Marks, John, William D. Davies, & Louis Finkelstein. (1985). The Cambridge History of Judaism. The American Historical Review. 90(1). 110–110. 4 indexed citations

9.

Marks, John & John Van Seters. (1984). In Search of History: Historiography in the Ancient World and the Origins of Biblical History. The American Historical Review. 89(2). 412–412. 33 indexed citations

10.

Marks, John & H. J. W. Drijvers. (1981). Cults and Beliefs at Edessa. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 101(4). 441–441. 30 indexed citations

11.

Marks, John & Javier Teixidor. (1979). The Pagan God, Popular Religion in the Greco-Roman near East. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 99(1). 117–117. 14 indexed citations

12.

Marks, John. (1975). A Guide to The Vitamins. 15 indexed citations

13.

Marks, John, et al.. (1965). Heilsmittler im Alten Testament und im Alten Orient. Journal of Biblical Literature. 84(2). 199–199. 1 indexed citations

14.

Marks, John, et al.. (1964). Creation Legends of the Ancient near East. Journal of Biblical Literature. 83(3). 329–329. 6 indexed citations

15.

Marks, John, et al.. (1959). A Beginner's Handbook to Biblical Hebrew. Journal of Biblical Literature. 78(1). 90–90.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact