Philip R. Woods

13 total papers · 626 total citations
8 papers, 144 citations indexed

About

Philip R. Woods is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and Rheumatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip R. Woods has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 144 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Molecular Biology, 2 papers in Epidemiology and 2 papers in Rheumatology. Recurrent topics in Philip R. Woods's work include Neurological diseases and metabolism (2 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (2 papers) and T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers). Philip R. Woods is often cited by papers focused on Neurological diseases and metabolism (2 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (2 papers) and T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (2 papers). Philip R. Woods collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Philip R. Woods's co-authors include B. F. Smith, Jin‐Hong Shin, Joe N. Kornegay, Dongsheng Duan, Yongping Yue, Clifford M. Honnas, Tom B. Yarbrough, James Schumacher, Dennis M. Meagher and R. W. Storts and has published in prestigious journals such as Laboratory Investigation, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Philip R. Woods

8 papers receiving 141 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Philip R. Woods	81	30	29	26	18	8	144
Leila Reyes	77 1.0×	15 0.5×	35 1.2×	25 1.0×	3 0.2×	7	218
Martina Mueller	90 1.1×	22 0.7×	25 0.9×	29 1.1×	4 0.2×	5	169
Katherine Krieger	82 1.0×	23 0.8×	24 0.8×	28 1.1×		7	257
Hannah M. Isles	62 0.8×	18 0.6×	29 1.0×	12 0.5×	2 0.1×	7	253
Alexandra Riddell	47 0.6×	24 0.8×	7 0.2×	15 0.6×	11 0.6×	8	159
Warren Ladiges	42 0.5×	23 0.8×	30 1.0×	8 0.3×		11	105
Elisabeth Streckel	121 1.5×	84 2.8×	43 1.5×	81 3.1×	2 0.1×	6	229
Emma L. Cambridge	64 0.8×	22 0.7×	44 1.5×	14 0.5×		8	217
Matthew Edwards	98 1.2×	26 0.9×	9 0.3×	18 0.7×		9	118
Anneliese R. Hill	81 1.0×	10 0.3×	31 1.1×	22 0.8×		6	259

Countries citing papers authored by Philip R. Woods

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip R. Woods's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip R. Woods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip R. Woods more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip R. Woods

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip R. Woods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip R. Woods. The network helps show where Philip R. Woods may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip R. Woods

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip R. Woods. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip R. Woods based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip R. Woods. Philip R. Woods is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact