Philip R. Ratcliffe
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Genetics
- Global and Planetary Change
- Small Animals top 10%
- Topics
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers)Ecology and biodiversity studies (7 papers)Music History and Culture (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip R. Ratcliffe
14 papers receiving 281 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Ecology 277
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 106
- Genetics 72
- Global and Planetary Change 51
- Small Animals 39
Countries citing papers authored by Philip R. Ratcliffe
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip R. Ratcliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip R. Ratcliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip R. Ratcliffe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip R. Ratcliffe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip R. Ratcliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip R. Ratcliffe. The network helps show where Philip R. Ratcliffe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip R. Ratcliffe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip R. Ratcliffe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip R. Ratcliffe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip R. Ratcliffe. Philip R. Ratcliffe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Mississippi John Hurt: His Life, His Times, His Blues | 0 |
| 3 | Sika deer in Scotland: density, population size, habitat use and fertility - some comparisons with red deer | 21 |
| 4 | Thetford Forest Park symposium: a summary | 1 |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | Roe Deer Biology and Management | 72 |
| 7 | The control of red and sika deer populations in commercial forests. | 8 |
| 8 | The management of red deer populations resident in upland forests | 1 |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | The Management of Red Deer in Upland Forests | 22 |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 71 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 8 |
About Philip R. Ratcliffe
Philip R. Ratcliffe is a scholar working on Music, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 336 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Ecology and biodiversity studies (7 papers) and Music History and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (277 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (106 citations) and Small Animals (39 citations). Philip R. Ratcliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include B. Mayle, B. Mitchell, G. F. Peterken, Katharine Abernethy, R. J. Putman, B. W. Staines and S. J. Petty. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Journal of Zoology and Mammal Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.