G. F. Peterken
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Ecology top 1%
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Margaret GameMartin HermyKris VerheyenMark VellendHans Van CalsterHans JacquemynAnnette KolbE. P. Mountford
- Topics
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (22 papers)Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (21 papers)Forest Management and Policy (20 papers)
- Journals
- NatureEcologyJournal of Ecology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
G. F. Peterken
71 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 2.4k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.5k
- Plant Science 1.3k
- Ecology 1.3k
- Insect Science 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by G. F. Peterken
This map shows the geographic impact of G. F. Peterken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. F. Peterken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. F. Peterken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. F. Peterken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. F. Peterken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. F. Peterken. The network helps show where G. F. Peterken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. F. Peterken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. F. Peterken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. F. Peterken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. F. Peterken. G. F. Peterken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 152 | |
| 4 | 366 | |
| 5 | Metapopulation dynamics in a fragmented and dynamic landscape: forest plants in central Lincolnshire, United Kingdom | 5 |
| 6 | Long-term development in an area of The Mens, a minimum intervention woodland damaged by the great storm of 1987 | 1 |
| 7 | 98 | |
| 8 | Natural reserves in English woodlands. | 5 |
| 9 | 30 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 75 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 238 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 155 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 21 |
About G. F. Peterken
G. F. Peterken is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Insect Science and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 74 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (22 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (21 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (2.4k citations), Insect Science (1.3k citations) and Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations). G. F. Peterken has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Game, Martin Hermy, Kris Verheyen, Mark Vellend, Hans Van Calster, Hans Jacquemyn, Annette Kolb, E. P. Mountford, P. S. Lloyd and E. W. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Ecology and Journal of Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.