Philip R. Heath
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Algebra and Number Theory top 10%
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ronald BrownKlaus KampsPeter WongHelga SchirmerChris MorganXuezhi ZhaoGraham H. NortonVlastimil Dlab
- Topics
- Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (20 papers)Advanced Topics in Algebra (9 papers)Geometric and Algebraic Topology (9 papers)
- Journals
- Pacific Journal of MathematicsMathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical SocietyProceedings of the London Mathematical Society
- Partner nations
- CanadaChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip R. Heath
41 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Mathematical Physics 231
- Geometry and Topology 211
- Algebra and Number Theory 105
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 63
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 45
Countries citing papers authored by Philip R. Heath
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip R. Heath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip R. Heath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip R. Heath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip R. Heath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip R. Heath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip R. Heath. The network helps show where Philip R. Heath may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip R. Heath
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip R. Heath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip R. Heath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip R. Heath. Philip R. Heath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Groupoids, stability cokernel sequences and duality | 1 |
| 19 | An introduction to homotopy theory via groupoids and universal constructions | 3 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Philip R. Heath
Philip R. Heath is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (20 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (9 papers) and Geometric and Algebraic Topology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (231 citations), Geometry and Topology (211 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (105 citations). Philip R. Heath has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Brown, Klaus Kamps, Peter Wong, Helga Schirmer, Chris Morgan, Xuezhi Zhao, Graham H. Norton, Vlastimil Dlab, Peter Nickolas and M. M. Parmenter. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society and Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.