Philip R. Fox
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 0.2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Si‐Kwang LiuBarry J. MaronBruce W. KeeneJohn E. RushRebecca L. StepienJohn D. BonaguraVirginia Luis FuentesJens Häggström
- Topics
- Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments (55 papers)Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (22 papers)Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip R. Fox
107 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 2.9k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.5k
- Epidemiology 1.0k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 678
- Small Animals 608
Countries citing papers authored by Philip R. Fox
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip R. Fox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip R. Fox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip R. Fox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip R. Fox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip R. Fox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip R. Fox. The network helps show where Philip R. Fox may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip R. Fox
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip R. Fox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip R. Fox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip R. Fox. Philip R. Fox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 187 | |
| 2 | ACVIM consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of myxomatous mitral valve disease in dogsbreakdown → | 459 |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 77 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 390 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 63 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | Pericardial disease in the cat: a retrospective evaluation of 66 cases. | 37 |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 183 |
About Philip R. Fox
Philip R. Fox is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Small Animals, having authored 108 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Conditions and Treatments (55 papers), Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (22 papers) and Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (2.9k citations), Equine (184 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (2.5k citations). Philip R. Fox has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Si‐Kwang Liu, Barry J. Maron, Bruce W. Keene, John E. Rush, Rebecca L. Stepien, John D. Bonagura, Virginia Luis Fuentes, Jens Häggström, Mark A. Oyama and Mark E. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Experimental Neurology and Heredity.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.