Nadia Zakaria
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Epidemiology
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Sorcha Ní DhubhghaillCarina KoppenMarie‐José TassignonJ. RozemaBert Van den BogerdIrene Ruiz HidalgoMichel HaagdorensVeerle Van Gerwen
- Topics
- Corneal Surgery and Treatments (33 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (24 papers)Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (21 papers)
- Cited by
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingOphthalmologyPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Nadia Zakaria
45 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.2k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 690
- Ophthalmology 451
- Epidemiology 145
- Genetics 121
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Zakaria
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Zakaria's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Zakaria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Zakaria more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Zakaria
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Zakaria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Zakaria. The network helps show where Nadia Zakaria may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Zakaria
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Zakaria. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Zakaria based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Zakaria. Nadia Zakaria is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 29 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 91 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | Automated detection of Fuchs’ dystrophy through a machine learning algorithm using Pentacam data | 1 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 130 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 65 | |
| 16 | 91 | |
| 17 | A Novel Fish Scale Derived Scaffold for Ocular Reconstruction | 1 |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Nadia Zakaria
Nadia Zakaria is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Ophthalmology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (33 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (24 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.2k citations), Ophthalmology (451 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (690 citations). Nadia Zakaria has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Sorcha Ní Dhubhghaill, Carina Koppen, Marie‐José Tassignon, J. Rozema, Bert Van den Bogerd, Irene Ruiz Hidalgo, Michel Haagdorens, Veerle Van Gerwen, Zwi Berneman and Pablo Rodríguez. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biomaterials and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.