Philip Meyer

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
39 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Philip Meyer is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Meyer has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Communication, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Philip Meyer's work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (3 papers). Philip Meyer is often cited by papers focused on Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Media Influence and Politics (3 papers). Philip Meyer collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Philip Meyer's co-authors include Edmund B. Lambeth, Esther Thorson, Harvey Siy, Sanjukta Bhowmick, Stanley Wearden, Deborah Potter, Carolyn Marvin, Florian Auer, Everette E. Dennis and Iñaki Soto‐Rey and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Public Opinion Quarterly and International Journal of Public Opinion Research.

In The Last Decade

Philip Meyer

33 papers receiving 872 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index

1988 427 citations Philip Meyer Journalism Quarterly profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Philip Meyer United States	12	569	514	113	75	57	39	1.0k
Bill Kovach United States	5	854 1.5×	536 1.0×	102 0.9×	66 0.9×	84 1.5×	7	1.2k
Dominic L. Lasorsa United States	16	1.1k 2.0×	696 1.4×	136 1.2×	95 1.3×	96 1.7×	31	1.6k
Farida Vis United Kingdom	10	458 0.8×	465 0.9×	65 0.6×	138 1.8×	50 0.9×	14	868
Tom Rosenstiel United States	9	1.0k 1.8×	716 1.4×	124 1.1×	97 1.3×	126 2.2×	10	1.5k
Jan Schmidt Germany	13	447 0.8×	355 0.7×	62 0.5×	50 0.7×	71 1.2×	79	828
Dan Gillmor United States	6	953 1.7×	511 1.0×	69 0.6×	56 0.7×	81 1.4×	10	1.3k
Eric Wright United States	4	381 0.7×	296 0.6×	93 0.8×	86 1.1×	31 0.5×	4	798
Hyunjin Seo United States	17	442 0.8×	531 1.0×	46 0.4×	89 1.2×	63 1.1×	77	944
Ruthann Weaver Lariscy United States	17	910 1.6×	656 1.3×	65 0.6×	43 0.6×	59 1.0×	32	1.3k
Jeffrey A. Gottfried United States	9	544 1.0×	702 1.4×	110 1.0×	151 2.0×	108 1.9×	15	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Meyer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Meyer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Meyer. The network helps show where Philip Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Meyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Meyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Meyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Meyer. Philip Meyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Meyer, Philip, Dominik Müller, Anna Muzalyova, et al.. (2025). Do explainable AI (XAI) methods improve the acceptance of AI in clinical practice? An evaluation of XAI methods on Gleason grading. The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research. 11(2). e70023–e70023.

2.

Meyer, Philip, Bruno Märkl, Ralf Huss, et al.. (2024). Assessing the Performance of Deep Learning for Automated Gleason Grading in Prostate Cancer. Studies in health technology and informatics. 316. 1110–1114. 2 indexed citations

3.

Schmid, Verena, Philip Meyer, Florian Auer, et al.. (2023). MISM: A Medical Image Segmentation Metric for Evaluation of Weak Labeled Data. Diagnostics. 13(16). 2618–2618.

4.

Meyer, Philip. (2010). Rescatando el periodismo de calidad: la supervivencia en la web 3.0. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 39–44. 3 indexed citations

5.

Meyer, Philip, et al.. (2005). Survey Yields Five Factors of Newspaper Quality. Newspaper Research Journal. 26(1). 6–15. 20 indexed citations

6.

Meyer, Philip. (2004). The Influence Model and Newspaper Business. Newspaper Research Journal. 25(1). 66–83. 37 indexed citations

7.

Meyer, Philip. (2002). Precision Journalism. 1 indexed citations

8.

Meyer, Philip, et al.. (2002). Social Responsibility Wins When CEO Has Been Editor. Newspaper Research Journal. 23(1). 25–37. 11 indexed citations

9.

Meyer, Philip & Yuan Zhang. (2002). Anatomy of a Death Spiral: Newspapers and Their Credibility. 2 indexed citations

10.

Lambeth, Edmund B., Philip Meyer, & Esther Thorson. (1998). Assessing public journalism. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 76 indexed citations

11.

Meyer, Philip & Deborah Potter. (1998). Preelection Polls and Issue Knowledge in the 1996 U.S. Presidential Election. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 3(4). 35–43. 8 indexed citations

12.

Meyer, Philip. (1991). The New Precision Journalism. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 55 indexed citations

13.

Meyer, Philip, et al.. (1991). Beating Disclosure to Death. Newspaper Research Journal. 12(3). 2–7. 2 indexed citations

14.

Meyer, Philip. (1990). PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS: POLLING AS POLITICAL SCIENCE AND POLLING AS JOURNALISM. Public Opinion Quarterly. 54(3). 451–459. 5 indexed citations

15.

Meyer, Philip. (1988). Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index. Journalism Quarterly. 65(3). 567–574. 427 indexed citations breakdown →

16.

Meyer, Philip. (1987). Commentary: Polls are Predictions (So Let's Stop Kidding Ourselves). Newspaper Research Journal. 8(3). 83–89.

17.

Meyer, Philip & Stanley Wearden. (1984). The Effects of Public Ownership on Newspaper Companies: A Preliminary Inquiry. Public Opinion Quarterly. 48(3). 564–564. 9 indexed citations

18.

Meyer, Philip. (1978). Models for Editorial Decision Making: The Benefits of Semi-Formality. Journalism Quarterly. 55(1). 77–83.

19.

Meyer, Philip. (1975). Institut Pasteur: private or state institute.. BMJ. 1(5953). 326–327. 2 indexed citations

20.

Meyer, Philip. (1973). Precision Journalism: A Reporter's Introduction to Social Science Methods. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 181 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact