Philip M. Sherman
- Gastroenterology top 0.05%
- Endocrinology top 0.1%
- Escherichia coli research studies 61
- Biological Psychiatry top 0.5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 0.1%
- Infant Nutrition and Health 35
- Food Science top 0.1%
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods 39
-
- Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies 93
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis 65
-
- Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology 56
-
- Gut microbiota and health 55
-
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease 38
- Co-authors
- Kathene C. Johnson‐HenryBrendan DrummMélanie G. GareauAnne M. GriffithsErnest CutzNicola L. JonesW. Allan WalkerMary H. Perdue
- Journals
- New England Journal of Medicine (4 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Nucleic Acids Research (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip M. Sherman
403 papers receiving 19.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 182
- Gastroenterology 3.2k
- Endocrinology 1.9k
- Biological Psychiatry 439
- Nutrition and Dietetics 2.6k
- Food Science 3.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Sherman
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Sherman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Sherman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Sherman. The network helps show where Philip M. Sherman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip M. Sherman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 184 | |
| 7 | An update on the use and investigation of probiotics in health and diseasebreakdown → | 2013 | 377 |
| 8 | 2009 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 308 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1996 | 192 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 209 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 96 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 27 | |
| 19 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1986 | 29 |
About Philip M. Sherman
Philip M. Sherman is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 413 papers that have together received 20.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (93 papers), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (65 papers), Escherichia coli research studies (61 papers), Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology (56 papers), Gut microbiota and health (55 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (39 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (38 papers) and Infant Nutrition and Health (35 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (3.2k citations), Endocrinology (1.9k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (439 citations). Philip M. Sherman has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kathene C. Johnson‐Henry, Brendan Drumm, Mélanie G. Gareau, Anne M. Griffiths, Ernest Cutz, Nicola L. Jones, W. Allan Walker, Mary H. Perdue, Derek M. McKay and Mohamed A. Karmali. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.