Philip M. Enock
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Richard J. McNallyStefan G. HofmannPeter C. ClasenChristopher G. BeeversDavid M. SchnyerCynthia M. TsaiMargaret E. CraneRudi De Raedt
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Abnormal PsychologyBehaviour Research and TherapyJournal of Psychiatric Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumAustralia
In The Last Decade
Philip M. Enock
7 papers receiving 383 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 302
- Cognitive Neuroscience 161
- Clinical Psychology 148
- Applied Psychology 74
- Sociology and Political Science 33
Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Enock
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Enock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Enock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Enock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Enock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Enock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Enock. The network helps show where Philip M. Enock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Enock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Enock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Enock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Enock. Philip M. Enock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 143 | |
| 6 | 144 | |
| 7 | 75 |
About Philip M. Enock
Philip M. Enock is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 7 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (302 citations), Applied Psychology (74 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (161 citations). Philip M. Enock has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. McNally, Stefan G. Hofmann, Peter C. Clasen, Christopher G. Beevers, David M. Schnyer, Cynthia M. Tsai, Margaret E. Crane, Rudi De Raedt, Ernst H. W. Koster and Nazanin Derakshan. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Journal of Psychiatric Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.