Philip M. Enock

8 total papers · 536 total citations
7 papers, 388 citations indexed

About

Philip M. Enock is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip M. Enock has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 388 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Philip M. Enock's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). Philip M. Enock is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). Philip M. Enock collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and China. Philip M. Enock's co-authors include Richard J. McNally, Stefan G. Hofmann, Peter C. Clasen, David M. Schnyer, Christopher G. Beevers, Cynthia M. Tsai, Ernst H. W. Koster, Margaret E. Crane, Rudi De Raedt and Nazanin Derakshan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Abnormal Psychology, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Journal of Psychiatric Research.

In The Last Decade

Philip M. Enock

7 papers receiving 380 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip M. Enock 300 161 145 74 32 7 388
Kyriaki Nikolaou 153 0.5× 159 1.0× 128 0.9× 89 1.2× 24 0.8× 10 433
Arnaud Pictet 325 1.1× 119 0.7× 177 1.2× 79 1.1× 28 0.9× 9 430
Lori Kwapil 133 0.4× 109 0.7× 119 0.8× 98 1.3× 23 0.7× 8 336
Jesolyn Lucas 134 0.4× 136 0.8× 119 0.8× 99 1.3× 18 0.6× 7 391
Laura O’Toole 192 0.6× 143 0.9× 131 0.9× 68 0.9× 47 1.5× 11 343
Lisa Simon 178 0.6× 130 0.8× 103 0.7× 76 1.0× 30 0.9× 9 376
Jonathan D. Horowitz 210 0.7× 101 0.6× 167 1.2× 59 0.8× 14 0.4× 6 399
Virginie Peschard 292 1.0× 170 1.1× 227 1.6× 38 0.5× 23 0.7× 13 430
Ema Tanovic 218 0.7× 157 1.0× 101 0.7× 36 0.5× 16 0.5× 9 345
Nicole D. Ottenbreit 246 0.8× 69 0.4× 272 1.9× 55 0.7× 33 1.0× 5 428

Countries citing papers authored by Philip M. Enock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip M. Enock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip M. Enock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip M. Enock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip M. Enock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip M. Enock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip M. Enock. The network helps show where Philip M. Enock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip M. Enock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip M. Enock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip M. Enock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip M. Enock. Philip M. Enock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026