Philip Lewis
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems top 2%
- Law top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Karl W. KuhnertThomas C. ErrenMirjan DamaškaThomas PalayMarc GalanterCatherine PorterJacques DerridaHorst‐Werner Korf
- Topics
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin (18 papers)Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (8 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetCirculationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip Lewis
106 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
- Sociology and Political Science 571
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 431
- Political Science and International Relations 319
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 303
- Law 243
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Lewis. The network helps show where Philip Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Lewis. Philip Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 124 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | CULTURE AND ITS EFFECT ON INCOME MEASUREMENT PRACTICES - AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF GRAY'S THEORY OF CONSERVATISM | 1 |
| 18 | Revitalizing Medicare: Shared Problems, Public Solutions | 11 |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | THE INTERPRETATION AND USE OF SPEED/FLOW RELATIONSHIPS FOR TRANSPORT PLANNERS | 2 |
About Philip Lewis
Philip Lewis is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 113 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (18 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (8 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (303 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (431 citations) and Law (243 citations). Philip Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karl W. Kuhnert, Thomas C. Erren, Mirjan Damaška, Thomas Palay, Marc Galanter, Catherine Porter, Jacques Derrida, Horst‐Werner Korf, William B. Horning and Ken D. O’Halloran. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Circulation and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.