Philip Levy

668 citations
27 papers · 471 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Levy

24 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Philip Levy
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 139
  • Applied Psychology 33
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 64
  • Statistics and Probability 36
  • Clinical Psychology 72
Replace Ralph Hoepfner with:
Ralph Hoepfner United States
Roy D. Goldman United States
Duncan N. Hansen United States
Lutz F. Hornke Germany
Edward W. Minium United States
Alexander G. Wesman Germany
Wayne S. Zimmerman United States
José Santacreu Spain
Charles D. Smock United States
Eric Rolfhus United States
Philip Levy relative to Ralph Hoepfner United States Ralph Hoepfner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Ralph Hoepfner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Levy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Levy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Levy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Levy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Levy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Levy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Levy. The network helps show where Philip Levy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Philip Levy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Levy Line = papers co-authored together Philip Levy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1967148
2 196880
3 199454
4 196736
5 199227
6 196919
7
Tests in Education: A Book of Critical Reviews
198419
8 198711
9 19749
10 19669
11
Cognition in action, 2nd ed.
19949
12 19697
13 19956
14 19695
15 19675
16 19645
17 19695
18 19723
19 19623
20 19693

About Philip Levy

Philip Levy is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Anthropology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and History, having authored 27 papers that have together received 471 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (3 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (2 papers), Reliability and Maintenance Optimization (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper), Engineering Diagnostics and Reliability (1 paper) and American Literature and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (139 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (64 citations), Statistics and Probability (36 citations) and Clinical Psychology (72 citations). Philip Levy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Israel and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Peter E. Morris, Alan F. Collins, Mary M. Smyth, Harvey Goldstein, Derek Pugh, David Elmakis and Ruth Beard. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology and British Journal of Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact