Philip K. Dick
- Philosophy top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (6 papers)Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (5 papers)Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers)
- Journals
- Medical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
Philip K. Dick
27 papers receiving 112 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Philosophy 58
- Sociology and Political Science 57
- Cultural Studies 40
- Literature and Literary Theory 39
- Clinical Psychology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Philip K. Dick
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip K. Dick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip K. Dick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip K. Dick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip K. Dick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip K. Dick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip K. Dick. The network helps show where Philip K. Dick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip K. Dick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip K. Dick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip K. Dick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip K. Dick. Philip K. Dick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick | 2 |
| 2 | Blade runner : (Do androids dream of electric sheep?) | 8 |
| 3 | The Shifting Realities of Philip K. Dick: Selected Literary and Philosophical Writings | 26 |
| 4 | Blade Runner - sní androidi o elektrických ovečkách? | 0 |
| 5 | Confessions of a crap artist--Jack Isidore (of Seville, Calif.) : a chronicle of verified scientific fact 1945-1959 | 0 |
| 6 | The Eye of the Sibyl and Other Classic Stories | 1 |
| 7 | The selected letters of Philip K. Dick | 3 |
| 8 | We Can Remember It for You Wholesale | 17 |
| 9 | Mary and the Giant | 0 |
| 10 | Robots, androids, and mechanical oddities : the science fiction of Philip K. Dick | 1 |
| 11 | In Milton Lumky Territory | 1 |
| 12 | The Divine Invasion | 1 |
| 13 | A Maze of Death | 1 |
| 14 | Galactic Pot-Healer | 1 |
| 15 | Counter-Clock World | 3 |
| 16 | The Crack in Space | 2 |
| 17 | The Penultimate Truth | 4 |
| 18 | Eye in the Sky | 3 |
| 19 | The World Jones Made | 1 |
| 20 | Second Variety and Other Classic Stories | 1 |
About Philip K. Dick
Philip K. Dick is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Philosophy and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 44 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (6 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (5 papers) and Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (58 citations), Cultural Studies (40 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (39 citations). Frequent co-authors include Paul Williams, Mark Hurst, Pamela Jackson and Martin Harry Greenberg. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.