Emma Langley
Impact in
- Neurology top 5%
- Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Internal Medicine top 10%
Papers in
-
- Family and Disability Support Research 6
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 2
-
- Disability Rights and Representation 5
- Co-authors
- Ali Alawieh (6 shared papers)Stephen Tomlinson (4 shared papers)Richard P. Hastings (5 shared papers)DeAnna L. Adkins (2 shared papers)Vasiliki Totsika (5 shared papers)Alejandro M Spiotta (2 shared papers)Alex Toft (2 shared papers)Anita Franklin (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neuroscience (3 papers)Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (1 paper)British Journal of Learning Disabilities (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Autism Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma Langley
17 papers receiving 676 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Neurology 215
- Internal Medicine 39
- Neurology 137
- Developmental Neuroscience 30
- Rehabilitation 45
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Langley
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Langley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Langley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Langley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Langley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Langley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Langley. The network helps show where Emma Langley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Langley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 127 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 121 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 95 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 43 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 34 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 |
About Emma Langley
Emma Langley is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Neurology, Neurology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Disability Support Research (6 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (5 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (4 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (215 citations), Internal Medicine (39 citations), Neurology (137 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (30 citations) and Rehabilitation (45 citations). Emma Langley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ali Alawieh, Stephen Tomlinson, Richard P. Hastings, DeAnna L. Adkins, Vasiliki Totsika, Alejandro M Spiotta, Alex Toft, Anita Franklin, Wuwei Feng and Robert M. Starke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, BMJ Open and Autism Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.