Philip J. Urness
- Ecology top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- William CollinsDennis D. AustinNorbert V. DeByleRobert A. RiggsFrederick D. ProvenzaE. S. ZyznarJohn BrooksJohn C. Malechek
- Topics
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management (30 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (23 papers)Ecology and biodiversity studies (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Urness
57 papers receiving 643 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Ecology 712
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 306
- Agronomy and Crop Science 205
- Global and Planetary Change 173
- Plant Science 132
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Urness
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Urness's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Urness with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Urness more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Urness
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Urness. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Urness. The network helps show where Philip J. Urness may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip J. Urness
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip J. Urness. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip J. Urness based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip J. Urness. Philip J. Urness is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | WILD UNGULATE DEPREDATION ON WINTER WHEAT: EFFECTS ON GRAIN YIELD | 4 |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Changes in mule deer size in Utah | 1 |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | Biological manipulation of blackbrush by goat browsing Coleogyne ramosissima, rangeland in the southwestern United States. | 3 |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | Diameter-length--weight relations for blackbrush branches. | 1 |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | The influence of predator control on two adjacent wintering deer herds | 3 |
| 20 | Nutritive value of mule deer forages on ponderosa pine summer range in Arizona | 9 |
About Philip J. Urness
Philip J. Urness is a scholar working on Ecology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Anthropology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 903 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland and Wildlife Management (30 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (23 papers) and Ecology and biodiversity studies (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (712 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (306 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (205 citations). Philip J. Urness has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include William Collins, Dennis D. Austin, Norbert V. DeByle, Robert A. Riggs, Frederick D. Provenza, E. S. Zyznar, John Brooks, John C. Malechek, James E. Bowns and Karen L. Launchbaugh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Journal of Wildlife Management and Small Ruminant Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.