Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Pluralism of Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach
2007535 citationsAlexander W. Cappelen, Erik Ø. Sørensen et al.profile →
Cutthroat Capitalism versus Cuddly Socialism: Are Americans More Meritocratic and Efficiency-Seeking than Scandinavians?
2019168 citationsIngvild Almås, Alexander W. Cappelen et al.Journal of Political Economyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Bertil Tungodden
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Bertil Tungodden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bertil Tungodden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bertil Tungodden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bertil Tungodden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bertil Tungodden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bertil Tungodden. The network helps show where Bertil Tungodden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bertil Tungodden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bertil Tungodden.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bertil Tungodden based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bertil Tungodden. Bertil Tungodden is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bursztyn, Leonardo, Alexander W. Cappelen, Bertil Tungodden, Alessandra Voena, & David Yanagizawa-Drott. (2023). How are Gender Norms Perceived?. SSRN Electronic Journal.
6.
Bursztyn, Leonardo, Alexander W. Cappelen, Bertil Tungodden, Alessandra Voena, & David Yanagizawa-Drott. (2023). How Are Gender Norms Perceived?. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
Buser, Thomas, Alexander W. Cappelen, Uri Gneezy, Moshe Hoffman, & Bertil Tungodden. (2021). Competitiveness, gender and handedness. Economics & Human Biology. 43. 101037–101037.3 indexed citations
Asheim, Geir B. & Bertil Tungodden. (2005). A new equity condition for infinite utility streams and the possibility of being Paretian. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 55–68.1 indexed citations
Tungodden, Bertil, Nicholas Stern, & Ivar Kolstad. (2004). Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Europe 2003 : Toward Pro-Poor Policies--Aid, Institutions, and Globalization. World Bank Publications.10 indexed citations
18.
Tungodden, Bertil, Nicholas Stern, & Ivar Kolstad. (2004). Toward pro-poor policies : aid, institutions, and globalization. World Bank eBooks.43 indexed citations
19.
Tungodden, Bertil. (2003). Some reflections on the role of moral reasoning in economics. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 30. 49–59.2 indexed citations
20.
Tungodden, Bertil. (1996). Poverty and Justice: A Rawlsian Framework. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 23. 89–104.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.