Philip J. Candilis
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 14
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Ethics in medical practice 19
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues 8
- Philosophy top 5%
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 11
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 9
-
- Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare 9
-
- Torture, Ethics, and Law 6
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence 5
- Co-authors
- Charles W. LidzPaul S. AppelbaumRobert M. ArnoldCynthia GeppertKenneth E. FletcherChristina DordingGisele Gus ManfroLorna J. Simon
- Journals
- Annals of Internal Medicine (1 paper)Schizophrenia Bulletin (1 paper)Psychopharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Candilis
60 papers receiving 731 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Clinical Psychology 313
- General Health Professions 299
- Psychiatry and Mental health 151
- Pharmacy 47
- Philosophy 95
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Candilis
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Candilis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Candilis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Candilis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Candilis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Candilis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Candilis. The network helps show where Philip J. Candilis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip J. Candilis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 8 | AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense | 2014 | 18 |
| 9 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 57 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1999 | 88 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 9 |
About Philip J. Candilis
Philip J. Candilis is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 65 papers that have together received 773 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (19 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (14 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (11 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (9 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (8 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (6 papers) and Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (313 citations), General Health Professions (299 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (151 citations). Philip J. Candilis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles W. Lidz, Paul S. Appelbaum, Robert M. Arnold, Cynthia Geppert, Kenneth E. Fletcher, Christina Dording, Gisele Gus Manfro, Lorna J. Simon, William Gardner and John J. Worthington. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Internal Medicine, Schizophrenia Bulletin and Psychopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.