Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy.
Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Mossman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Mossman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Mossman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Mossman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Mossman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Mossman. The network helps show where Douglas Mossman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas Mossman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas Mossman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas Mossman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas Mossman. Douglas Mossman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mossman, Douglas, et al.. (2017). What Is Your Liability for Involuntary Commitment Based on Faulty Information. Current psychiatry. 16(3). 21.3 indexed citations
2.
Mossman, Douglas. (2014). Are the People We Serve 'Patients7 Or'customers'?. Current psychiatry. 13(3). 40.1 indexed citations
3.
Janofsky, Jeffrey S., Philip J. Candilis, Wade C. Myers, et al.. (2014). AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online/The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 42.18 indexed citations
Mossman, Douglas, et al.. (2011). Should You Prescribe Medications for Family and Friends. Current psychiatry. 10(6). 41.2 indexed citations
6.
Mossman, Douglas & Helen Farrell. (2011). Physician Impairment: When Should You Report?. Current psychiatry. 10(9). 67.
7.
Mossman, Douglas. (2011). Risky Business versus Overt Acts: What Relevance Do Actuarial, Probabilistic Risk Assessments Have for Judicial Decisions on Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalization. SSRN Electronic Journal.
8.
Mossman, Douglas, et al.. (2010). Incompetence to Maintain a Divorce Action: When Breaking Up is Odd to Do. eYLS (Yale Law School).1 indexed citations
9.
Mossman, Douglas. (2009). The Imperfection of Protection Through Detection and Intervention: Lessons from Three Decades of Research on the Psychiatric Assessment of Violence Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
10.
Mossman, Douglas. (2009). Conceptualizing and Characterizing Accuracy in Assessments of Competence to Stand Trial. SSRN Electronic Journal.
11.
Mossman, Douglas, et al.. (2009). Testifying for Civil Commitment: Help Unwilling Patients Get Treatment They Need. Current psychiatry. 8(11). 50.2 indexed citations
Mossman, Douglas. (1995). Dangerousness Decisions: An Essay on the Mathematics of Clinical Violence Prediction and Involuntary Hospitalization. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 2(1). 7.4 indexed citations
Mossman, Douglas. (1992). The Psychiatrist and Execution Competency: Fording Murky Ethical Waters. Case Western Reserve law review. 43(1). 1.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.