Philip Huie

4.1k citations
81 papers · 3.1k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Philip Huie

80 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Philip Huie
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Ophthalmology 239
  • Transplantation 69
  • Immunology 426
  • Hematology 191
Replace Luk H. Vandenberghe with:
Luk H. Vandenberghe United States
Anindita Basu United States
Noo Li Jeon South Korea
Kapil Bharti United States
Jacques P. Tremblay Canada
Vyacheslav Kalchenko Israel
Stephen D. Hauschka United States
Bence György United States
Hirofumi Suemori Japan
Ulrike Blömer Germany
Philip Huie relative to Luk H. Vandenberghe United States Luk H. Vandenberghe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Luk H. Vandenberghe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Huie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Huie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Huie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Huie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Huie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Huie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Huie. The network helps show where Philip Huie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Huie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Huie Line = papers co-authored together Philip Huie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012343
2 2015264
3 1999172
4 2001132
5 2007106
6 2013105
7 201398
8 201990
9 200489
10 200279
11 201678
12 199871
13 197768
14 197966
15 201465
16 200859
17 199857
18 201651
19
Pulsed electron avalanche knife (PEAK) for intraocular surgery.
200150
20 198149

About Philip Huie

Philip Huie is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Ophthalmology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (18 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (14 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (10 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (7 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (6 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (5 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Ophthalmology (239 citations), Transplantation (69 citations), Immunology (426 citations) and Hematology (191 citations). Philip Huie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include M. Locke, Daniel Palanker, Keith Mathieson, T. I. Kamins, Samuel Strober, Georges Goetz, Alexander Sher, Alexander Vankov, Yossi Mandel and Richard Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Tissue and Cell, Transplantation, Journal of Neuroscience and IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact