Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Classical Complement Cascade Mediates CNS Synapse Elimination
20072.4k citationsAlexander Sher, A. M. Litke et al.profile →
Astrocytes mediate synapse elimination through MEGF10 and MERTK pathways
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Sher
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Sher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Sher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Sher more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Sher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Sher. The network helps show where Alexander Sher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander Sher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander Sher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander Sher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander Sher. Alexander Sher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Grosberg, Lauren E., Paweł Hottowy, Lauren H. Jepson, et al.. (2015). Axon activation with focal epiretinal stimulation in primate retina. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 780–780.1 indexed citations
11.
Palanker, Daniel, Henri Lorach, Georges Goetz, et al.. (2014). Photovoltaic Restoration of Sight in Rats with Retinal Degeneration: Assessment of Spatial Resolution and Visual Functions. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 5964–5964.2 indexed citations
Beier, Corinne, Jennifer Kung, Philip Huie, et al.. (2014). Bipolar Cells Restructure Dendrites After Selective Ablation of Photoreceptors. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 4171–4171.1 indexed citations
14.
Triplett, Jason W., Cory Pfeiffenberger, Jena Yamada, et al.. (2011). Competition is a driving force in topographic mapping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(47). 19060–19065.44 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Bryan W., et al.. (2011). Neural Activity in the Inner Retina After Photocoagulation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 52(14). 1170–1170.4 indexed citations
16.
Sher, Alexander, Loh-Shan Leung, Theodore Leng, et al.. (2010). Retinal Plasticity and Restoration of Function After Photocoagulation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 2482–2482.3 indexed citations
Sher, Alexander, Jeffrey L. Gauthier, Greg D. Field, et al.. (2009). Functional Identification of Individual Cones in the Receptive Fields of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 6150–6150.1 indexed citations
20.
Field, Greg D., Jeffrey L. Gauthier, Martin Greschner, et al.. (2008). Light Adaptation Changes the Size of Receptive Fields in Seven Distinct Primate Retinal Ganglion Cell Types. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 3856–3856.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.