Philip H. Jos
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Public Administration top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark E. TompkinsSteven W. HaysMartin PerlmutterMary Faith MarshallAnnette WatsonWilliam A. Clark
- Topics
- Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers)Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers)Regulation and Compliance Studies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Public AdministrationInformation Systems and ManagementOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Journals
- Public Administration ReviewThe Journal of PoliticsJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Philip H. Jos
19 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Sociology and Political Science 159
- Information Systems and Management 130
- Public Administration 116
- Strategy and Management 89
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 74
Countries citing papers authored by Philip H. Jos
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip H. Jos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip H. Jos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip H. Jos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip H. Jos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip H. Jos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip H. Jos. The network helps show where Philip H. Jos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip H. Jos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip H. Jos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip H. Jos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip H. Jos. Philip H. Jos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 80 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 136 | |
| 19 | 9 |
About Philip H. Jos
Philip H. Jos is a scholar working on Public Administration, Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management and Information Systems and Management, having authored 19 papers that have together received 429 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers) and Regulation and Compliance Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (116 citations), Information Systems and Management (130 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (74 citations). Philip H. Jos has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark E. Tompkins, Steven W. Hays, Martin Perlmutter, Mary Faith Marshall, Annette Watson and William A. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, The Journal of Politics and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.