Mark E. Tompkins

984 total citations
20 papers, 791 citations indexed

About

Mark E. Tompkins is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark E. Tompkins has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 791 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 5 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Mark E. Tompkins's work include Birth, Development, and Health (7 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (7 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers). Mark E. Tompkins is often cited by papers focused on Birth, Development, and Health (7 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (7 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (4 papers). Mark E. Tompkins collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark E. Tompkins's co-authors include Philip H. Jos, G R Alexander, Thomas C. Hulsey, Greg R. Alexander, Steven W. Hays, Marilee C Allen, Donna J. Petersen, Carlton A. Hornung, Eve Powell‐Griner and Kirby L. Jackson and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Epidemiology, American Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Mark E. Tompkins

20 papers receiving 720 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark E. Tompkins United States 14 333 187 123 112 106 20 791
Tay McNamara United States 18 298 0.9× 159 0.9× 361 2.9× 12 0.1× 12 0.1× 53 892
Theresa Morris United States 13 84 0.3× 130 0.7× 34 0.3× 7 0.1× 12 0.1× 31 503
Suzanne M. Carter United States 5 331 1.0× 634 3.4× 24 0.2× 10 0.1× 40 0.4× 7 1.2k
Stjepan Orešković Croatia 15 31 0.1× 55 0.3× 252 2.0× 24 0.2× 12 0.1× 63 712
Christopher Dougherty United Kingdom 14 119 0.4× 96 0.5× 75 0.6× 12 0.1× 2 0.0× 27 798
Darren Grant United States 12 61 0.2× 78 0.4× 121 1.0× 4 0.0× 5 0.0× 33 466
Linda de Caestecker United Kingdom 9 94 0.3× 56 0.3× 87 0.7× 13 0.1× 5 0.0× 25 568
Jay Saha India 13 118 0.4× 35 0.2× 90 0.7× 14 0.1× 13 0.1× 23 975
Diane Vinokur‐Kaplan United States 12 106 0.3× 4 0.0× 245 2.0× 60 0.5× 13 0.1× 24 863
José Mendes Ribeiro Brazil 16 124 0.4× 7 0.0× 421 3.4× 6 0.1× 40 0.4× 66 773

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Tompkins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Tompkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Tompkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Tompkins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Tompkins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Tompkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Tompkins. The network helps show where Mark E. Tompkins may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Tompkins

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Tompkins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Tompkins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Tompkins. Mark E. Tompkins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jos, Philip H. & Mark E. Tompkins. (2009). Keeping It Public: Defending Public Service Values in a Customer Service Age. Public Administration Review. 69(6). 1077–1086. 30 indexed citations
2.
Jos, Philip H. & Mark E. Tompkins. (2004). The Accountability Paradox in an Age of Reinvention. Administration & Society. 36(3). 255–281. 80 indexed citations
3.
Allen, Marilee C, Greg R. Alexander, Mark E. Tompkins, & Thomas C. Hulsey. (2000). Racial differences in temporal changes in newborn viability and survival by gestational age. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 14(2). 152–158. 68 indexed citations
4.
Alexander, Greg R., Mark E. Tompkins, Marilee C Allen, & Thomas C. Hulsey. (1999). Trends and Racial Differences in Birth Weight and Related Survival. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 3(2). 71–79. 39 indexed citations
5.
Jos, Philip H. & Mark E. Tompkins. (1995). Administrative Practice and the Waning Promise of Professionalism for Public Administration. The American Review of Public Administration. 25(3). 207–229. 6 indexed citations
6.
Alexander, G R, et al.. (1995). Discordance between LMP-based and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy.. PubMed. 110(4). 395–402. 96 indexed citations
7.
Hulsey, Thomas C., et al.. (1992). Validity of postnatal assessments of gestational age: A comparison of the method of Ballard et al. and early ultrasonography. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 166(3). 891–895. 51 indexed citations
8.
Alexander, Greg R., et al.. (1992). Ethnic variation in postnatal assessments of gestational age: a reappraisal. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 6(4). 423–433. 19 indexed citations
9.
Alexander, Greg R., et al.. (1991). Source of bias in prenatal care utilization indices: implications for evaluating the Medicaid expansion.. American Journal of Public Health. 81(8). 1013–1016. 26 indexed citations
10.
Alexander, G R, et al.. (1990). Gestational age reporting and preterm delivery.. PubMed. 105(3). 267–75. 82 indexed citations
11.
Alexander, Greg R., Donna J. Petersen, Eve Powell‐Griner, & Mark E. Tompkins. (1989). A comparison of gestational age reporting methods based on physician estimate and date of last normal menses from fetal death reports.. American Journal of Public Health. 79(5). 600–602. 15 indexed citations
12.
Petersen, Donna J., Greg R. Alexander, Eve Powell‐Griner, & Mark E. Tompkins. (1989). Variations in the reporting of gestational age at induced termination of pregnancy.. American Journal of Public Health. 79(5). 603–606. 8 indexed citations
13.
Jos, Philip H., Mark E. Tompkins, & Steven W. Hays. (1989). In Praise of Difficult People: A Portrait of the Committed Whistleblower. Public Administration Review. 49(6). 552–552. 136 indexed citations
14.
Tompkins, Mark E.. (1988). Have Gubernatorial Elections Become More Distinctive Contests?. The Journal of Politics. 50(1). 192–205. 25 indexed citations
16.
Tompkins, Mark E.. (1987). South Carolina's diked tidal wetlands: The presisting dilemmas. Coastal Management. 15(2). 135–155. 2 indexed citations
17.
Tompkins, Mark E., et al.. (1985). THE RISK OF LOW BIRTH WEIGHT ALTERNATIVE MODELS OF NEONATAL MORTALITY. American Journal of Epidemiology. 122(6). 1067–1079. 12 indexed citations
18.
Alexander, G R, et al.. (1985). Racial differences in the relation of birth weight and gestational age to neonatal mortality.. PubMed. 100(5). 539–47. 63 indexed citations
19.
Tompkins, Mark E.. (1984). The Electoral Fortunes of Gubernatorial Incumbents: 1947-1981. The Journal of Politics. 46(2). 520–543. 27 indexed citations
20.
Tompkins, Mark E., et al.. (1977). Some Notes on the Domain of Public Policy Studies. Policy Studies Journal. 6(2). 305–313. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026