Philip G. Ladd
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Co-authors
- Colin J. YatesRay FroendNeil E. PettitKingsley W. DixonRoberto CrostiDavid NewsomeNeal J. EnrightB. Piotto
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (47 papers)Plant and animal studies (32 papers)Plant Diversity and Evolution (21 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsEcological Modeling
- Journals
- ScienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNew Phytologist
- Partner nations
- AustraliaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip G. Ladd
83 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 691
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 651
- Plant Science 522
- Ecology 456
- Global and Planetary Change 272
Countries citing papers authored by Philip G. Ladd
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip G. Ladd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip G. Ladd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip G. Ladd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip G. Ladd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip G. Ladd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip G. Ladd. The network helps show where Philip G. Ladd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip G. Ladd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip G. Ladd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip G. Ladd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip G. Ladd. Philip G. Ladd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 68 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | Dynamics of the overstorey and species richness in Australian heathlands | 11 |
| 16 | Adaptation of behaviour by two bird species as a result of habituation to humans | 14 |
| 17 | 83 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Philip G. Ladd
Philip G. Ladd is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Forestry and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (47 papers), Plant and animal studies (32 papers) and Plant Diversity and Evolution (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (691 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (651 citations) and Ecological Modeling (124 citations). Philip G. Ladd has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Colin J. Yates, Ray Froend, Neil E. Pettit, Kingsley W. Dixon, Roberto Crosti, David Newsome, Neal J. Enright, B. Piotto, Sandro Pignatti and Mark Brundrett. Their work appears in journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and New Phytologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.