Clinton Whipple
Impact in
- Plant Science top 1%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Genetics top 5%
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Papers in
-
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 19
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 6
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations 5
- Co-authors
- Robert J. SchmidtDavid JacksonGeorge ChuckSarah HakeElizabeth A. KelloggPeter BommertJohn DoebleyMadelaine Bartlett
- Journals
- The Plant Cell (5 papers)Development (3 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (3 papers)G3 Genes Genomes Genetics (3 papers)Nature Communications (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Clinton Whipple
31 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Plant Science 1.6k
- Genetics 465
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Agronomy and Crop Science 154
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 237
Countries citing papers authored by Clinton Whipple
This map shows the geographic impact of Clinton Whipple's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clinton Whipple with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinton Whipple more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clinton Whipple
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clinton Whipple. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clinton Whipple. The network helps show where Clinton Whipple may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Clinton Whipple, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 120 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 60 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 79 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 76 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 106 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 198 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 103 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 163 |
About Clinton Whipple
Clinton Whipple is a scholar working on Plant Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics, Agronomy and Crop Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (19 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (13 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (9 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (6 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (5 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (5 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (5 papers) and Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.6k citations), Genetics (465 citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (154 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (237 citations). Clinton Whipple has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Schmidt, David Jackson, George Chuck, Sarah Hake, Elizabeth A. Kellogg, Peter Bommert, John Doebley, Madelaine Bartlett, Barbara A. Ambrose and Pietro Ciceri. Their work appears in journals such as The Plant Cell, Development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, G3 Genes Genomes Genetics and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.