Philip de Pous
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Genetics top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Salvador CarranzaWouter BeukemaJeroen SpeybroeckС. А. КузьминAriel RodríguezAnna BonardiMathieu DenoëlPierre‐André Crochet
- Topics
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology (14 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers)Genetic diversity and population structure (8 papers)
In The Last Decade
Philip de Pous
19 papers receiving 623 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Global and Planetary Change 453
- Ecological Modeling 373
- Genetics 254
- Ecology 241
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 154
Countries citing papers authored by Philip de Pous
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip de Pous's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip de Pous with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip de Pous more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip de Pous
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip de Pous. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip de Pous. The network helps show where Philip de Pous may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip de Pous
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip de Pous. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip de Pous based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip de Pous. Philip de Pous is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 330 | |
| 9 | Integrating mtDNA analyses and ecological niche modelling to infer the evolutionary history of Alytes maurus (Amphibia; Alytidae) from Morocco | 10 |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | A contribution to the atlas of the terrestrial herpetofauna of Sardinia | 5 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 35 | |
| 19 | Remarks on the morphology and distribution of Lyciasalamandra luschani finikensis with the discovery of a new isolated population | 5 |
About Philip de Pous
Philip de Pous is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change and Genetics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (14 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (12 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (373 citations), Global and Planetary Change (453 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (115 citations). Philip de Pous has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Portugal and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Salvador Carranza, Wouter Beukema, Jeroen Speybroeck, С. А. Кузьмин, Ariel Rodríguez, Anna Bonardi, Mathieu Denoël, Pierre‐André Crochet, Claudia Corti and Neftalí Sillero. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biodiversity and Conservation and Biological Journal of the Linnean Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.